Teams

Te.Marcott40A

2026 Capital Adult 40 & Over 2.5 · Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-16vs Er.Mobley40ALost 12
L#1 DoublesCarrie Janovich / Krista Heller vs Millie Raynor / Angela McGee1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Clark / Elizabeth Kirby vs Gina Hardy / Colleen Mcauliffe6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesHeidi Doyle / Rebecca Rabon vs Erica Mobley / Bridget Welborn6-7, 2-6
2026-05-09vs El.Robinson40ALost 12
L#1 DoublesAnn Flores / Cindy Markham vs Gail Scoggin / Sarah Sims Chesson6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCarrie Janovich / Karen Clark vs Ashleigh Black / Tucker Andrews2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHeather Jones / Heidi Doyle vs Laura Noah / Lindsay Mcaulay2-6, 3-6
2026-05-02vs Ke.Nels40ALost 03
L#1 DoublesAnn Flores / Terry Marcott vs Kelly Nels / Erin Reis0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLorna Hirsch / Krista Heller vs Lauren Gentile / ROBIN STEWART2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHeidi Doyle / Elizabeth Kirby vs Joanne Cross / Joli Rueter3-6, 0-6
2026-04-30vs De.Farmer40A2.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesAnn Flores / Cindy Markham vs Kacey Barcliff / Carol Ann Mcmillan6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Kirby / Rebecca Rabon vs Lori Christian / Tiffany Scotton2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesHeidi Doyle / Krista Heller vs Patrice Farmer / Hala Souid6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-04-18vs Da.Russo40AWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnn Flores / Cindy Markham vs Diane Bosnjak King / Mugdha Oltikar6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTerry Marcott / Elizabeth Kirby vs Kelly Thompson / Amanda Haymore7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHeidi Doyle / Krista Heller vs Susan Gentry / Kari Marotta6-4, 6-4
2026-04-11vs Le.Beatty40ALost 12
L#1 DoublesAnn Flores / Carrie Janovich vs Drewry Carter / Mary Hartigan1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLorna Hirsch / Terry Marcott vs Lindsay Singler / Rebekah Noulles4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKrista Heller / Rebecca Rabon vs Katie Brummer / Sheffield Kropp7-5, 6-4
2026-03-21vs Ja.Bossert40ALost 03
L#1 DoublesCarrie Janovich / Cindy Markham vs Margaret Barham / Katherine Jackson2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Clark / Terry Marcott vs Laura Robison / Kristin Wehmeyer1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLorna Hirsch / Elizabeth Kirby vs Grace Poole / Susan Furr4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-03-14vs Kr.Faulkner40AWon 21
W#1 DoublesCindy Markham / Ann Flores vs Katherine Clarida / Jeanna Hastie6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKrista Heller / Lorna Hirsch vs Kaye Seagle / Jennifer Edmunds5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesHeather Jones / Heidi Doyle vs Jennifer Paschal / Junga Han6-0, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ke.Nels40A7119511121
2El.Robinson40A7116820177
3Er.Mobley40A6217717185
4Ja.Bossert40A5317717173
5Le.Beatty40A53111326201
6Te.Marcott40A3591533243
7Da.Russo40A2681634213
8De.Farmer40A2.51742041267
9Kr.Faulkner40A0861838245

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.15 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.43
Ann Flores
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.31
Carrie Janovich
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.25
Lorna Hirsch
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.23
Elizabeth Kirby
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.23
Krista Heller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.17
Cindy Markham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.16
Rhonda Rowe
published 2.5
2.04
Heather Jones
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.00
Terry Marcott
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
1.97
Heidi Doyle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.84
Rebecca Rabon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Flores + Cindy Markham4263% games+9.7% vs expected
Carrie Janovich + Cindy Markham4256% games+6.4% vs expected
Terry Marcott + Lorna Hirsch123 matchesnot enough data
Heidi Doyle + Elizabeth Kirby123 matchesnot enough data
Heidi Doyle + Heather Jones123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Ann Flores
14W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%69%31%
2.43
2.5
Carrie Janovich
11W–12L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.31
Lorna Hirsch
3W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Elizabeth Kirby
3W–8L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.23
Krista Heller
8W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.23
2.5
Cindy Markham
12W–9L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
Rhonda Rowe
59W–143L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.16
2.5
Heather Jones
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Terry Marcott
2W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00
2.5
Heidi Doyle
4W–12L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.97
Rebecca Rabon
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.