Teams

KS-REG-Eccles/18&Over7.0MXD

18 & Over Mixed Section Championship · 7.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / KANSAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings7 teams · 7.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IA-REG-Duhautois/18&Over7.0MXD000000
2NE-REG-Erwin/Kephart/18&Over7.0MXD000000
3HOA-REG-Craig/18&Over7.0MXD000000
4KS-REG-Eccles/18&Over7.0MXD000000
5MO-REG-Wassom/18&OverMXD7.0000000
6OKWC-REG-Cuadra-Willis/MIXED18&over7.0x000000
7NEWC-Blake/18&Over7.0MXD000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Anne Burris
published 4
3.33
Elizabeth Herman
published
3.32
Mathew Sankoorikal
published
Amanda Poole
published 3.5
2.94
Lee Leinwetter
published
2.82
Don Eccles
published
Marcus Contee
published
Michelle Robinson
published
Michelle Rose
published
Rocky Burris
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Burris + Rocky Burris4744% gamesnot enough data
Marcus Contee + Michelle Rose5171% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anne Burris
73W–83L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.55
Elizabeth Herman
37W–24L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Mathew Sankoorikal
28W–50L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Amanda Poole
12W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lee Leinwetter
26W–53L career · no lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
2.94
Don Eccles
23W–101L career · no lines in 2024
90%10%<1%
2.82
Marcus Contee
59W–89L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michelle Robinson
37W–20L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michelle Rose
36W–16L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rocky Burris
7W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.