Teams

LCTA40/McCreaNimmich/LTPDI

2022 STA 40 & Over Combo Doubles · 40 & Over Combo Women - 6.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.19 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo Women - 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Susan Whitfield
published
3.28
Elaine Cechak
published 3.5
3.28
Amy Gege
published 3.5
3.23
Karen SZEGI-Wimpey
published
3.08
Faye Bull
published 3.5
2.87
Nancy Pitcairn
published
2.87
Amira Cranor
published 3
2.86
Melissa Ann Symonds
published
2.84
Rose Ann Ferber
published
2.82
Lisa Nimmich
published
2.82
Christina Baxter
published 3
2.78
Carol Noble
published 3
Cobey Wagoner
published 3
2.70
2.65
Mary McCrea
published
2.63
Patty Evanko
published
Denise Chah
published
Kathryn Whitaker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Noble + Mary McCrea5458% games+12.8% vs expected
Cynthia Nargi Moran + Nancy Pitcairn6260% games+6.6% vs expected
Christina Baxter + Patty Evanko2441% games+5.1% vs expected
Nancy Pitcairn + Amira Cranor27661% games+3.5% vs expected
Faye Bull + Susan Whitfield10457% games−1.5% vs expected
Nancy Pitcairn + Carol Noble1643% games−8.8% vs expected
Lisa Nimmich + Christina Baxter1633% games−11.3% vs expected
Nancy Pitcairn + Patty Evanko2445% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Whitfield
64W–50L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Elaine Cechak
51W–34L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Amy Gege
49W–41L career · type A · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
Karen SZEGI-Wimpey
63W–60L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Faye Bull
40W–47L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Nancy Pitcairn
74W–55L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Amira Cranor
50W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.87
Melissa Ann Symonds
9W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
2.86
Rose Ann Ferber
17W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
2.84
Lisa Nimmich
3W–18L career · no lines in 2022
92%8%<1%
2.82
3
Christina Baxter
25W–35L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Carol Noble
34W–59L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Cobey Wagoner
3W–8L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Cynthia Nargi Moran
36W–41L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
Mary McCrea
17W–21L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
Patty Evanko
59W–67L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
2.63
Denise Chah
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathryn Whitaker
12W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.