Teams

SPB/ Fieni

2023 SPB Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-08vs Indian Spring - LizWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Fernandes / Debra Fieni vs Hermine Greene / Suzanne Mesko7-6, 6-2
2023-04-29vs Indian Spring - LizLost 01
L#2 DoublesLillie Hileman / Ruthly Lesane vs Lisa Consigli / Kirsten McKeen6-0, 6-7, 0-1
2023-04-08vs Indian Spring - LizWon 30
W#1 DoublesBarbara Cabral / Andrea Cornelissen vs Elizabeth Kaes / Lisa Consigli6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNancy Currea / Lillie Hileman vs Hermine Greene / Suzanne Mesko6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRuthly Lesane / Steffani Lomax vs Eileen Masciale / Maureen Rigaudon7-6, 7-6
2023-04-01vs Indian Spring - LizWon 20
W#1 DoublesNancy Currea / Ruthly Lesane vs Elizabeth Kaes / Lisa Consigli6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLillie Hileman / Kathleen Fernandes vs Hermine Greene / Suzanne Mesko6-1, 6-1
2023-03-18vs Indian Spring - LizWon 20
W#2 DoublesRuthly Lesane / Nancy Currea vs Hermine Greene / Eileen Masciale7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSteffani Lomax / Kathleen Fernandes vs Annette Miko / Kirsten McKeen6-1, 6-1
2023-03-11vs Indian Spring - LizWon 20
W#1 DoublesBarbara Cabral / Andrea Cornelissen vs Elizabeth Kaes / Kim Franklin6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRuthly Lesane / Shelly Simmel vs Maureen Rigaudon / Diane Williams6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Andrea Cornelissen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.37
Kathleen Fernandes
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Alison Harrison
published 4.5
4.19
Lillie Hileman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Ruthly Lesane
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.09
Barbara Cabral
published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ruthly Lesane + Kathleen Fernandes8263% gamesnot enough data
Lillie Hileman + Kathleen Fernandes4451% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrea Cornelissen
70W–63L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
4.37
4.5
Kathleen Fernandes
34W–16L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
4.37
4.5
Alison Harrison
49W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Lillie Hileman
55W–65L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Ruthly Lesane
20W–22L career · 5 lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
4.16
4.5
Barbara Cabral
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
4.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.