Teams

Lagoon-Cannady-5.5-18

2023 18 & Over Southern Combo Doubles - Montgomery · 5.5 Combo Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.83 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 5.5 Combo Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Karen Steineker
published
2.82
Rebecca Pines
published
2.79
Caroline Morse
published 3
2.78
LaVonda Daniels
published
2.71
Lisa Melton-Farmer
published
2.69
Felicia Brooks
published 3
2.47
Judith Heinzman
published
2.46
Vanessa Edwards
published
2.43
Linda Echols
published
2.37
Kay Cannady
published
Carolyn Strickland
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Pines + Felicia Brooks2433% games−6.8% vs expected
Kay Cannady + Vanessa Edwards044 matchesnot enough data
Judith Heinzman + Vanessa Edwards033 matchesnot enough data
LaVonda Daniels + Felicia Brooks033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Steineker
28W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%32%68%
3.06
Rebecca Pines
20W–57L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Caroline Morse
11W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
2.79
LaVonda Daniels
16W–32L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.78
Lisa Melton-Farmer
28W–33L career · no lines in 2023
0%6%94%
2.71
3
Felicia Brooks
24W–63L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
Judith Heinzman
1W–19L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
2.47
Vanessa Edwards
2W–17L career · no lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
2.46
Linda Echols
0W–8L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%0%
2.43
Kay Cannady
9W–35L career · no lines in 2023
85%15%<1%
2.37
2.5
Camilla Franklin-Gibson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Carolyn Strickland
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.