Teams

Cody Greenway / Kent Young

Northern Tier - Adults · 4.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.83 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-11vs Kevin Fiorenzo / Daniel ParkWon 21
W#1 SinglesBrenan Haines vs Hayden Chisholm4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Heitsenrether / Andrew Gordon McNeal Jr. vs Win Lawson / Christopher Carson2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKent Young vs Daniel Park0-6, 1-6
2026-06-14vs Kevin Fiorenzo / Daniel ParkWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael LeBlanc / Robert McCormack vs Kevin Fiorenzo / Jon Schwantes6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesBrenan Haines vs Win Lawson6-0, 6-0
2026-05-30vs Jason Hinkledire - Dayvon AddisonWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrenan Haines / Michael LeBlanc vs John Thompson / John Lody6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJohn Heitsenrether / Andrew Gordon McNeal Jr. vs Dayvon Addison / Tarkeshwar Singh6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesBrian Klinefelter vs Jean Mongeau1-6, 0-6
2026-05-16vs Kevin Fiorenzo / Daniel ParkLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichael LeBlanc / Scott Stichelbaut vs Eric Claus / Michael Hromchak5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBrenan Haines vs Hayden Chisholm2-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Jason Hinkledire - Dayvon Addison049716121
2Cody Greenway / Kent Young049717131
3Kevin Fiorenzo / Daniel Park0691532223

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Brenan Haines
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Daniel DeNucci
published 4
3.70
Michael LeBlanc
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Brian Klinefelter
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
John Heitsenrether
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kent Young
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Robert McCormack
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kent Young + John Heitsenrether044 matchesnot enough data
Kent Young + Brian Klinefelter123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brenan Haines
12W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Daniel DeNucci
5W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael LeBlanc
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Brian Klinefelter
6W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
John Heitsenrether
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kent Young
2W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Robert McCormack
18W–43L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.