Teams

The Fun Bunch - BHSC

2022 Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over Women · Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.08 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-28vs GlenmoreLost 01
L#3 DoublesLindy Kastendike / Wendi Ruschmann vs Sarah McCall / Jane Touzalin3-6, 3-6
2022-07-20vs BH - UnitedLost 01
L#3 DoublesJannemieke Keener / Anita McGinty vs Natasha Heller / Patricia Irby4-6, 3-6
2022-07-15vs Forest LakesSplit 11
W#2 DoublesWendi Ruschmann / Lindy Kastendike vs Marie Moss / Lisa Jackson6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSusan Knight / Jannemieke Keener vs Lynette Sanford / Shauna Hogg5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2022-07-06vs BH - UnitedLost 02
L#2 DoublesJannemieke Keener / Alice Raucher vs Silvia Blemker / Pascale Hapgood0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesWendi Ruschmann / Anita McGinty vs Courtney Heyward / Jeanne Ward1-6, 1-6
2022-06-24vs GlenmoreWon 10
W#3 DoublesJannemieke Keener / Wendi Ruschmann vs Allison Egidi / Christina Meyer6-0, 6-4
2022-06-22vs BH - UnitedSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJannemieke Keener vs Courtney Heyward0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesWendi Ruschmann / Lindy Kastendike vs Jeanne Ward / Ellen Ochs6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-15vs Forest LakesWon 10
W#3 DoublesWendi Ruschmann / Karen Overman vs Beth Kohler / Shauna Hogg6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Maggie Mudd
published
3.14
Megan Wyant
published
3.11
Anita McGinty
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Lindy Kastendike
published 3
2.90
2.85
Karen Overman
published
2.81
Jannemieke Keener
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.75
Wendi Ruschmann
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.57
Arlene Okun
published 3
Michele Rowan
published
Susan McConnell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jannemieke Keener + Wendi Ruschmann9954% games+8.2% vs expected
Lindy Kastendike + Wendi Ruschmann224 matchesnot enough data
Anita McGinty + Lindy Kastendike303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maggie Mudd
9W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.33
Megan Wyant
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Anita McGinty
73W–56L career · 2 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
Lindy Kastendike
73W–41L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Gretchen Masselli
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
2.90
Karen Overman
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Jannemieke Keener
56W–62L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Wendi Ruschmann
69W–67L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Arlene Okun
0W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
2.57
Michele Rowan
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan McConnell
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.