Teams

BTobia (Brookhaven)

2022 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-11vs JHerlong (Firethorne)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesGiuliana Bolanos / Kristin Eagan vs Breck Lindley / Vera James2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKate Merrill / Brenda Tobia vs Jennifer Herlong / TARA RAND0-6, 4-6
2022-10-07vs LAndersen (Chestnut)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesGiuliana Bolanos / Kristin Eagan vs Mary McGarvey / Stephanie Gossert3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKate Merrill / Brenda Tobia vs Becky Shopf / Christine Zetts3-6, 2-6
2022-09-23vs KMonson (Queens)Won 10
W#2 DoublesGiuliana Bolanos / Tammy Lutes vs Charlotte Haydon / Melissa Kreager6-4, 6-2
2022-09-16vs KHeidkamp (PCC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBrenda Tobia / Laura Hunter vs Reena Chow / Ashley Sofsian1-6, 1-6
2022-09-09vs MMetzl (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCarol Scott / Brenda Tobia vs Martha Metzl / Anne Wilson3-6, 1-6
2022-09-02vs ACutts (Weddington)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesGiuliana Bolanos / Tammy Lutes vs Amy Black / Tracy Lacroix6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBrenda Tobia / Kate Merrill vs Anne Cutts / Jacqui Gentile5-7, 2-6
2022-08-26vs LBaker/AReynolds (Charlotte Swim)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBrenda Tobia / Tammy Lutes vs Pam Tan / Renee Foster1-6, 1-6
2022-08-12vs JBullard (Blakeney)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesGiuliana Bolanos / Tammy Lutes vs Joan Bullard / Catherine Wigington4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBrenda Tobia / Kate Merrill vs Virginia Katzen / Rachel Grantham1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Loretta Anderson
published
3.38
Giuliana Bolanos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.14
Kate Merrill
published
2.88
Joanne Miller
published
2.81
Kimberly Stafford
published
2.54
Brenda Tobia
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
Pattye Figman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brenda Tobia + Giuliana Bolanos6165% gamesnot enough data
Kate Merrill + Brenda Tobia224 matchesnot enough data
Loretta Anderson + Giuliana Bolanos404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Loretta Anderson
34W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.46
3
Giuliana Bolanos
56W–19L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%<1%>99%
3.38
Kate Merrill
10W–12L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
Joanne Miller
19W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
Kimberly Stafford
11W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Brenda Tobia
32W–71L career · 7 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
2.54
Pattye Figman
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.