Teams

MOValley/Arnstein-Novatny/55&Over9.0M

2023 Adult 55 & Over · Men 9.0

10 players · average NTRP / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-22vs SchlueterWon 30
W#1 DoublesEduardo Abilez / John Novatny vs Philip Kammann / Paul Reiss7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGregg Hanson / Mark Sophir vs Tim Hasara / Scott Sutter6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesStephen Arnstein / Tony Richards vs Peter Kielhofner / Jon Tchen6-2, 6-2
2023-06-15vs SchlueterWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Novatny / Gregg Hanson vs William Schlueter / Philip Kammann6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRandy Freeman / Tony Richards vs Peter Kielhofner / Sam Shouldis6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStephen Arnstein / Mark Sophir vs Mark Medley / Jon Tchen6-2, 6-0
2023-06-08vs SchlueterLost 12
L#1 DoublesRandy Freeman / George Farmer vs Paul Reiss / Philip Kammann3-3
W#2 DoublesStephen Arnstein / Stan Hogrebe vs William Schlueter / Scott Sutter6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMark Sophir / James Barenkamp vs Peter Kielhofner / Sam Shouldis7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2023-06-01vs SchlueterLost 12
L#1 DoublesRandy Freeman / Gregg Hanson vs Philip Kammann / Paul Reiss2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesStan Hogrebe / James Barenkamp vs William Schlueter / Scott Sutter5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesStephen Arnstein / Tony Richards vs Tim Hasara / Jon Tchen6-3, 6-4
2023-05-25vs SchlueterWon 30
W#1 DoublesEduardo Abilez / Stan Hogrebe vs Tim Hasara / William Schlueter6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Novatny / Jim Syrett vs Peter Kielhofner / Matthew Weaver6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGeorge Farmer / Randy Freeman vs Paul Reiss / Jon Tchen6-4, 6-3
2023-05-18vs SchlueterWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Novatny / Jim Syrett vs Philip Kammann / Paul Reiss6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEduardo Abilez / Stan Hogrebe vs John Flahaut / Matthew Weaver6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRandy Freeman / Stephen Arnstein vs Peter Kielhofner / Jon Tchen6-2, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 9.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MOValley/Arnstein-Novatny/55&Over9.0M4214411122
2Schlueter2441429192

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Stan Hogrebe
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.16
Mark Sophir
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.09
Eduardo Abilez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.92
Tony Richards
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.92
James Barenkamp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.86
Stephen Arnstein
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Gregg Hanson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jim Syrett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
John Novatny
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Randy Freeman
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eduardo Abilez + Stan Hogrebe303 matchesnot enough data
John Novatny + Jim Syrett303 matchesnot enough data
Stephen Arnstein + James Barenkamp303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stan Hogrebe
11W–2L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
4.29
Mark Sophir
65W–28L career · 4 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
4.16
Eduardo Abilez
11W–3L career · 3 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
4.09
Tony Richards
9W–2L career · 3 lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
3.92
James Barenkamp
53W–59L career · 2 lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
3.92
Stephen Arnstein
24W–24L career · 5 lines in 2023
85%15%<1%
3.86
Gregg Hanson
5W–2L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jim Syrett
7W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
John Novatny
20W–3L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Randy Freeman
6W–5L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.