Teams

GSTL55/Williamson/Kingston

2025 Adult 55 & Over - GSTL · Adult Women 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-30vs GSTL55/Bass/DunesWon 30
W#1 DoublesDana Crosby / Laura Oljeski vs Amy Springs / Beth Warstler6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoAnn Crolley / Marie Wade vs Debbie Bass / Lisa Wallen6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCynthia Moran / Karen Comeau vs Leanne Cunning / Becky Walls6-4, 6-2
2025-02-23vs GSTL55/Bass/DunesWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarty Corley / JoAnn Crolley vs Beth Warstler / Donna Dellinger6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDana Crosby / Laura Oljeski vs Katharine Harsha / Becky Walls6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSharon Durant / Cynthia Moran vs Maria Kiser / Lisa Wallen6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Marty Corley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.98
JoAnn Crolley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.79
Laura Oljeski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.74
Karen Comeau
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Sharon Durant
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Dana Crosby
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.57
3.57
Cynthia Moran
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Marie Wade
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Patti Conrad
published
Susan Battle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

JoAnn Crolley + Marty Corley9071% games+3.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marty Corley
9W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%48%52%
4.00
JoAnn Crolley
11W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.98
Laura Oljeski
27W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.79
Karen Comeau
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
Sharon Durant
10W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Dana Crosby
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Caroline Williamson
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Cynthia Moran
12W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
Marie Wade
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Patti Conrad
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Battle
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.