Teams

Virdi-3.0-PB

2025 Team Singles Tournament-PB · 3.0 M

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-02-22vs Deans-3.0-PBLost 12
L#1 SinglesMehar Virdi vs Will Stevens4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesChandler Laudenheimer vs Charles Hanson6-4, 6-1
L#3 SinglesShea Malone vs Ethan Moore6-7, 2-6
2025-02-22vs Meyers-3.0-JXNLost 03
L#1 SinglesMehar Virdi vs Brandon Norton4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesChandler Laudenheimer vs Chad Myers1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesShiron Manandhar vs Peter Mills0-6, 1-6
2025-02-22vs Taylor-3.0-GCLost 12
W#1 SinglesAllen Boleware vs Patrick Taylor6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesMichael Butler vs Drew Bosarge1-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesShea Malone vs Bobby Nguyen1-6, 2-6
2025-02-22vs Boykin-3.0-PBWon 30
W#1 SinglesAllen Boleware vs Roberto Amay6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesShea Malone vs Michael Ouellette6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesMehar Virdi vs Jason Boykin7-6, 6-4
2025-02-22vs Sherrod-3.0-JXNWon 21
L#1 SinglesChandler Laudenheimer vs Julio Morales1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesAllen Boleware vs Joseph Boler6-4, 6-4
W#3 SinglesShea Malone vs DeAngelo Sherrod6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 3.0 M
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Taylor-3.0-GC5012310118
2Meyers-3.0-JXN41132564
3Deans-3.0-PB326918143
4Virdi-3.0-PB237817145
5Boykin-3.0-PB1431224162
6Sherrod-3.0-JXN0541122148

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Allen Boleware
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.88
Michael Butler
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.83
Chandler Laudenheimer
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.81
Mehar Virdi
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
2.59
Shea Malone
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.13
Shiron Manandhar
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shea Malone + Michael Butler2443% games+5.5% vs expected
Michael Butler + Allen Boleware213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Allen Boleware
70W–33L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
Michael Butler
50W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.88
3
Chandler Laudenheimer
21W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
Mehar Virdi
40W–54L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Shea Malone
16W–49L career · 4 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
2.59
Shiron Manandhar
4W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.