Teams

Martin

2021 Anne Arundel Adult 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over Women 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.57 / MARYLAND

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Helen Patterson
published 4
3.46
Dina Caddeo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.35
Lezlie Moreland
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Karen Yannone
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.29
Ramsay Erickson
published
3.27
Mesanie Lee
published
3.14
Kim Neiss
published 3.5
3.08
Rebecca Sellassie
published
3.08
Melissa Albers
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
2.92
Cassandra West
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Leigh Deeter
published
Shelley Sturtz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Albers + Lezlie Moreland5846% games−4.0% vs expected
Lezlie Moreland + Cassandra West4258% gamesnot enough data
Dina Caddeo + Cassandra West314 matchesnot enough data
Dina Caddeo + Helen Patterson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Helen Patterson
10W–14L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.70
4
Dina Caddeo
138W–171L career · 2 lines in 2021
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Lezlie Moreland
157W–166L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Karen Yannone
178W–151L career · 9 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
Ramsay Erickson
16W–25L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.29
Mesanie Lee
26W–27L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Kim Neiss
40W–62L career · no lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.14
Rebecca Sellassie
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.08
3.5
Melissa Albers
86W–110L career · 8 lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Cassandra West
64W–68L career · 10 lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
2.92
Leigh Deeter
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Shelley Sturtz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.