Teams

SGV Dare Doubles 3.0 -Flores - WN/SA12

2021 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.20 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
W#1 DoublesRebecca Berman / Sandra Zane vs Bianca Li / Ping Guan6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesChristine Pedroza / Alison Johnson vs XIAOHONG YANG / Miki Makiko Shimizu2-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesRachel Brereton / Sandra Zane vs Patricia McNulty / Wanda Shimazu6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKarissa Chabner Adams / Christine Pedroza vs Faith Yeaton / Kam Jara2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Cano / Christine Pedroza vs Lucille Marcella / Cindy McCarthy1-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesKarissa Chabner Adams / Christine Pedroza vs ANN GRAY / Heather Dinger7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLeilani Scholtz / Laura Shin vs ANALILY PARK / Nicole de la Cruz3-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesRebecca Berman / Sandra Zane vs Felicia Yu / Amy Harmer6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKarissa Chabner Adams / Christine Pedroza vs Piedad Valdez / Cindy Hernandez6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWendy Lin / Leilani Scholtz vs Susan Lee / Miki Makiko Shimizu1-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesRachel Brereton / Sandra Zane vs Stephanie Ells / Sheila Palmer6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLeslie Jiang / Maria Ramirez vs Wanda Shimazu / Irma Martinez6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesRachel Brereton / Sandra Zane vs Sophia Chang / Eryn Hoffman6-1, 7-6
L#1 DoublesRebecca Berman / Sandra Zane vs Rumduol Vuong / Felicia Yu2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Rachel Brereton
published
3.38
Demmi Setyono
published 3.5
3.27
Leslie Jiang
published
3.25
Rebecca Berman
published
3.07
Nichole Burston
published 3
3.04
Sandra Zane
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
2.90
Christine Pedroza
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.84
Leilani Scholtz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.72
Tamara Sobel
published
2.53
Maria Ramirez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Jiang + Sandra Zane2446% games−3.3% vs expected
Leilani Scholtz + Christine Pedroza033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Brereton
9W–2L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.72
3.5
Demmi Setyono
6W–14L career · no lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
3.38
Leslie Jiang
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
Rebecca Berman
10W–7L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.25
3
Nichole Burston
45W–38L career · no lines in 2021
<1%30%70%
3.07
3.5
Sandra Zane
146W–141L career · 11 lines in 2021
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Christine Pedroza
39W–40L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Leilani Scholtz
20W–37L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%88%11%
2.84
Tamara Sobel
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
2.72
Maria Ramirez
55W–39L career · 1 line in 2021
>99%<1%<1%
2.53

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.