Teams

Cross Court Wicked Winners

2021 55&Over Women · 6.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.06 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-09-01vs Millbrook HilltoppersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCarmina Magno McGovern / Donna Augustine vs Margaret Bova / Caroline Geerlings4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesVirginia Goldsmith / Niki Pagones vs Jane Parshall / Michele Dowd6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2021-08-30vs Millbrook HilltoppersWon 21
L#1 DoublesKelly Maloney / Jayasree Kaja vs Margaret Bova / HELEN COOK5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Hammond / Lori Hunt-Coico vs Susan Mercandetti / Caroline Geerlings7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKathy McCabe / Carol Incledon vs Mary Hilliard / Jane Parshall6-1, 6-1
2021-08-26vs TSR: S*M*A*S*HWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Hammond / Carmina Magno McGovern vs Melissa Glass / Audrey S-Morgan6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKelly Maloney / Jayasree Kaja vs Victoria Dunning / Mary Ann Cristiano6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCheryl Peruffo / Denise Mari vs Suzanne Ward / Linda Paiva6-1, 6-4
2021-08-16vs Millbrook HilltoppersWon 30
W#1 DoublesYvonne Walker / Carol Incledon vs Susan Mercandetti / Jean Phifer6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNiki Pagones / Nita Ballantyne vs Betsy Maas / Caroline Geerlings7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDenise Mari / Lori Hunt-Coico vs Jane Parshall / Mary Hilliard4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-08-10vs TSR: S*M*A*S*HWon 21
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Hammond / Nita Ballantyne vs Cheryl Palmer / Jodi Brodsky2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLori Hunt-Coico / Donna Augustine vs Suzanne Ward / Mary Ann Cristiano7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesVirginia Goldsmith / Carol Incledon vs Susan Decker / Christine Blossy7-5, 6-3
2021-08-05vs TSR: S*M*A*S*HWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Hammond / Nita Ballantyne vs Cheryl Palmer / Suzanne Ward7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesYvonne Walker / Suzanne Roemer vs Vicki Molodec / Victoria Dunning6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKathy McCabe / Kelly Maloney vs Susan Decker / Christine Blossy6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cross Court Wicked Winners6014412134
2Millbrook Hilltoppers1451021150
3TSR: S*M*A*S*H1451022148

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Yvonne Walker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.95
Nita Ballantyne
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.86
Carol Incledon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Kelly Maloney
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.77
Cheryl Peruffo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Denise Mari
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Elizabeth Hammond
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.67
Niki Pagones
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Donna Augustine
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.45
Carmina Magno McGovern
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Jayasree Kaja
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kathy McCabe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lori Hunt-Coico
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Virginia Goldsmith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Niki Pagones + Virginia Goldsmith6353% games+8.6% vs expected
Nita Ballantyne + Kelly Maloney10361% games+4.6% vs expected
Niki Pagones + Nita Ballantyne7063% games+2.9% vs expected
Donna Augustine + Carol Incledon4455% games+0.4% vs expected
Nita Ballantyne + Elizabeth Hammond312052% games−1.0% vs expected
Kelly Maloney + Virginia Goldsmith7359% games−3.3% vs expected
Kelly Maloney + Elizabeth Hammond4449% games−11.4% vs expected
Jayasree Kaja + Donna Augustine3245% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Yvonne Walker
136W–87L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%79%21%
3.40
Nita Ballantyne
125W–62L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Carol Incledon
31W–27L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%86%13%
2.86
3
Kelly Maloney
150W–89L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Cheryl Peruffo
31W–24L career · 1 line in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Denise Mari
32W–26L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Elizabeth Hammond
105W–115L career · 7 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.72
Niki Pagones
32W–10L career · 2 lines in 2021
10%89%1%
2.67
3
Donna Augustine
67W–81L career · 2 lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
2.56
3
Carmina Magno McGovern
56W–59L career · 4 lines in 2021
66%34%<1%
2.45
Jayasree Kaja
19W–22L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kathy McCabe
9W–12L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lori Hunt-Coico
17W–11L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Virginia Goldsmith
28W–21L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.