Teams

Berry Twisted 3.5 WeekDay

Spring Adult 18 & Over WeekDAY · Ladies 3.5 18s

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-02-08vs Game Set LunchWon 30
W#1 SinglesGiovanna Dibiasi vs Julie Ohlmeyer6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesStacy Kelly Girton / Kim Harris vs Beth Rinke / Lynne Settle6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJami Boccella / Jeanette Johnson vs Veronica Leal / Staci Radtke7-5, 6-3
2022-04-28vs Point TakenWon 10
W#2 DoublesStacy Kelly Girton / Brenda House vs Celia Youngren / Lynn Longwill6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-21vs Not my FaultWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrenda House / Mallory Lundell vs Sarita Sherrill / Jaime Smith3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ladies 3.5 18s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Karla Brawner
published
3.68
Tammy Bray
published
3.31
Stacy Kelly Girton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Mallory Lundell
published
3.20
Giovanna Dibiasi
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Brenda House
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Geovanna Ricaldi
published 3.5
3.04
Letty Garcia
published
2.96
Floria Schmidt
published 3.5
2.95
Jami Boccella
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jessica Widmer
published
Julie Mulvey
published
Rhoda Wong
published
Terry Cornman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacy Kelly Girton + Floria Schmidt6261% games+2.5% vs expected
Geovanna Ricaldi + Floria Schmidt6650% games−3.3% vs expected
Giovanna Dibiasi + Geovanna Ricaldi5252% gamesnot enough data
Geovanna Ricaldi + Letty Garcia4254% gamesnot enough data
Giovanna Dibiasi + Tammy Bray213 matchesnot enough data
Tammy Bray + Stacy Kelly Girton213 matchesnot enough data
Letty Garcia + Julie Mulvey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karla Brawner
63W–27L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Tammy Bray
76W–65L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Stacy Kelly Girton
57W–29L career · 1 line in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Mallory Lundell
45W–41L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Giovanna Dibiasi
25W–28L career · 1 line in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Brenda House
75W–92L career · 2 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Geovanna Ricaldi
31W–29L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
Letty Garcia
42W–63L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
3.5
Floria Schmidt
23W–18L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
2.96
3.5
Jami Boccella
28W–45L career · type A · 1 line in 2022
65%35%<1%
2.95
Jessica Widmer
25W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Julie Mulvey
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rhoda Wong
46W–47L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Terry Cornman
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.