Teams

Burkwood Poehler

2024 Richmond Adult 65 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 65 & Over Weekday 7.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.33 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-07vs ACAC LarueSplit 11
W#1 DoublesVirginia Bowie / Sandy Price vs Judy Napier / Susan Lockhart4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Ann Cox / Frances Poehler vs Virginia Nelson / Linda Wood6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2024-06-04vs RCC AmesLost 01
L#1 DoublesVirginia Bowie / Frances Poehler vs Marykay Stainback / Michele Riedel1-6, 5-7
2024-05-31vs Stonehenge SnavelyWon 10
W#1 DoublesVirginia Bowie / Frances Poehler vs Terri Estes / Cheryl Cacciotti6-1, 6-2
2024-05-17vs Raintree Evans/StahlingSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMary Ann Cox / Frances Poehler vs Frances Johnson / Catherine Fallin3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDonna Mourtzakis / Virginia Bowie vs Kathryn Darling / Barbara Portanova6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2024-05-10vs Westwood SmithWon 10
W#1 DoublesFrances Poehler / Virginia Bowie vs Sheryl Highfill / Lynda Smith6-0, 6-3
2024-05-03vs MTC GilfillanWon 10
W#1 DoublesFrances Poehler / Virginia Bowie vs Robin Meyer / Thayer Baird2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-04-19vs ACAC LarueLost 02
L#1 DoublesFrances Poehler / Mary Ann Cox vs Kathryn Williams / Linda Wood4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDonna Mourtzakis / Virginia Bowie vs Linda Larue / Judy Napier6-1, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 65 & Over Weekday 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Frances Poehler
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.23
Virginia Bowie
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.02
Donna Mourtzakis
published
2.73
Carolyn Shute
published 3
Jane Durbin
published
Lynne Read
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Virginia Bowie + Frances Poehler11659% games+5.8% vs expected
Donna Mourtzakis + Virginia Bowie213 matchesnot enough data
Donna Mourtzakis + Lynne Read123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Frances Poehler
120W–106L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Virginia Bowie
100W–71L career · 7 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Donna Mourtzakis
14W–15L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.02
3
Carolyn Shute
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Jane Durbin
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lynne Read
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.