Teams

Sykes/Krupin/Nashville

2026 Adult 40 & Over - Nashville · 3.0 Women

18 players · average NTRP 2.88 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-29vs Reedy/NashvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesZena Krupin / Laura Vidalakis vs Colleen Wilson / Ann Kehayes1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesClaudia Emfinger vs Susan Taylor6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesChristy Sykes / Ceri Hoover vs Doreen Caputo / Joanie Bowles5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRuth Harrison / Jennifer Cockrel vs Karen Findlay / Katie Brethour2-6, 6-7
W#4 DoublesSarah Esposito / Cara Ferguson vs Catherine Cate / Amy Brasley6-3, 6-2
2026-04-22vs Atwood/NashvilleLost 13
W#1 DoublesChristy Sykes / Zena Krupin vs Margaret Bramlett / Susan Gaither6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJennifer Cockrel / Ruth Harrison vs Jodi Atwood / LeAnn George4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Esposito / Cara Ferguson vs Terri Merklein / Michelle Grensing4-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesChristy Carter / Cindy Story vs Katie Neel / Sarah Beckman2-6, 0-6
2026-04-15vs Phillips/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesAmy Lodge / Nicole Hogue vs Meredith Hollomon / Jacqueline Phillips6-7, 6-7
W#1 SinglesChristy Carter vs Martha Galyon6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesClaudia Emfinger / Kerry Finley vs Nancy King / Nell Adams3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Cockrel / Ruth Harrison vs Wendy Baker / Angela Robbins2-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesGlyna Brooks / Angela Henry vs Jamie Vaughan / Glenda Anderson6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2026-04-08vs Hayslip/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesChristy Carter / Zena Krupin vs Shanoa Eastland / Shauna Bowers1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesClaudia Emfinger vs Vanessa Bui6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Lodge / Christy Sykes vs Amy Woosley / Melissa Hayslip6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRuth Harrison / Jennifer Cockrel vs Annie Pollard / Mary Oxford3-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesAngela Henry / Cara Ferguson vs Jenna Gunnels / Stephanie Ofenheusle3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-04-01vs Fisher/Bailey/NashvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesAmy Lodge / Ceri Hoover vs Holly Fisher / Aimee Lawson2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesCara Ferguson vs Mindy Cone1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesZena Krupin / Christy Carter vs Renee Atkins / Jenny Stoebner6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesClaudia Emfinger / Kerry Finley vs NICOLE BATEMAN / Barbara Zwerner6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#4 DoublesChristy Sykes / Nicole Hogue vs Kellyn Bailey / Sallie Cole4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-03-25vs Reedy/NashvilleWon 32
W#1 DoublesCeri Hoover / Amy Lodge vs Colleen Wilson / Kathy Hirsekorn6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesChristy Carter vs Susan Taylor4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesZena Krupin / Laura Vidalakis vs Doreen Caputo / Ann Kehayes6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesChristy Sykes / Cara Ferguson vs Sara White / Margaret Lovelette3-6, 1-6
W#4 DoublesClaudia Emfinger / Kerry Finley vs Karen Findlay / Beth Sather3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-03-19vs Atwood/NashvilleLost 05
L#1 DoublesKaren Ard / Jennifer Cockrel vs Margaret Bramlett / Susan Gaither3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesChristy Carter vs Sarah Beckman0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNicole Hogue / Christy Sykes vs Jodi Atwood / Terri Merklein1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesZena Krupin / Sarah Esposito vs Stephanie Kinard / Katie Neel0-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesGlyna Brooks / Cindy Story vs Kathleen Urban / Susan Severn1-6, 6-7
2026-03-04vs Phillips/NashvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesAmy Lodge / Christy Sykes vs Debbie Militante / Nancy King2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesChristy Carter vs Meredith Hollomon6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesNicole Hogue / Laura Vidalakis vs Elaine Lee / Kim West2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesClaudia Emfinger / Cara Ferguson vs Jamie Vaughan / Jennifer Freeland7-6, 6-2
L#4 DoublesJennifer Cockrel / Ruth Harrison vs Glenda Anderson / Trudy Sullivan4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Fisher/Bailey/Nashville8038215243
2Stempel/Nashville62281231333
3Dale/Nashville62271331294
4Sanford/Trevino/Nashville53231738338
5Atwood/Nashville44221842341
6Stevenson/Cochran/Nashville26132758408
7Sjursen/Nashville26112963425
8Sykes/Krupin/Nashville17122859401

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Claudia Emfinger
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Laura Vidalakis
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.89
Christy Sykes
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.89
Ceri Hoover
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.88
Nicole Hogue
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.75
Christy Carter
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.65
Cara Ferguson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.60
Kerry Finley
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.58
Ruth Harrison
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
2.55
Zena Krupin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.55
Angela Henry
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.49
Amy Lodge
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.47
Jennifer Cockrel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.41
Sarah Esposito
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
Cindy Story
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.09
Cari Isham
published 2.5
Glyna Brooks
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Peggy Waldrop
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ruth Harrison + Jennifer Cockrel2940% games−1.9% vs expected
Cara Ferguson + Christy Sykes134 matchesnot enough data
Kerry Finley + Claudia Emfinger123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Claudia Emfinger
4W–3L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
2.90
Laura Vidalakis
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Christy Sykes
8W–13L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Ceri Hoover
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Nicole Hogue
8W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Christy Carter
9W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Cara Ferguson
6W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
Kerry Finley
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Ruth Harrison
4W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
Zena Krupin
3W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Angela Henry
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.55
Amy Lodge
1W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.49
Jennifer Cockrel
6W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.47
Sarah Esposito
5W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
2.41
2.5
Cindy Story
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Cari Isham
2W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Glyna Brooks
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Peggy Waldrop
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.