Teams

Woodmont/Levine

2025 Broward Adult 18 & Over - Spring Day · 4.5 Adult 18 & Over Women

17 players · average NTRP 4.33 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesAlexandra Santoro / Ellen Raskin vs Natalia Moll / Sarah Austin2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSusie Valls vs Gabriela Castanon3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBianca Alvarez / Gricel Boto Bernales vs Camila Giraldo / Giselle Asplundh4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Mesko / Hermine Greene vs Amanda Brahim / Diana C Cardenas2-6, 2-6
2025-06-06vs WestonHills//FederLost 03
L#1 DoublesNATALI SPILBERG / Cynthia Carolina Hernandez Romero vs Laurie Mathews / Valeria Ricotta3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesEllen Raskin vs Kimberly OMahony3-3
L#3 DoublesDaniela Pastore / Suzanne Mesko vs Samie Lesperance / Joy Rabbini2-6, 2-6
2025-05-17vs Veltri/WankLost 12
W#1 SinglesNatasha Torres vs Kasia Kobylarz6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBianca Alvarez / NATALI SPILBERG vs Barbara Barrios / Ainara Godoy3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesEllen Raskin vs Kumiko Currie4-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesBianca Alvarez / Gricel Boto Bernales vs Cheryl Hicks / Sarah Austin3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesNatasha Torres vs Jaclyn Rock4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMirella Sprinckmoller / Patricia Vicente vs Melissa Leighton / Laura Graff0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesEllen Raskin vs Diana C Cardenas1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesHermine Greene / Suzanne Mesko vs Laurin Stocker / Natalia Moll0-6, 3-6
2025-05-03vs WestonHills//FederLost 12
W#1 SinglesNatasha Torres vs Nicole Kaplan6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesGricel Boto Bernales vs Elena Gonzalez0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEllen Raskin / Marie Valdes vs Marcie Lynch / Lori Schlam3-6, 3-6
2025-05-01vs Veltri/WankLost 04
L#1 DoublesNATALI SPILBERG / Gricel Boto Bernales vs Kumiko Currie / Lola Grosjean2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesNatasha Torres vs Brooke Oransky3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEllen Raskin / Suzanne Mesko vs Margaret Campbell / Karen Williams4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSusie Valls / Daniela Hernandez vs Lillie Hileman / Maria Suarez3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.45
Natasha Torres
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
Alexandra Santoro
published 4.5
4.22
NATALI SPILBERG
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.15
Bianca Alvarez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.14
Angela Jimenez
published 4.5
4.09
Gricel Boto Bernales
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.01
Hermine Greene
published 4.5
3.94
3.92
Ellen Raskin
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
3.86
Marie Valdes
published
3.81
Daniela Pastore
published 4.5
3.72
Mirella Sprinckmoller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Loren Levine
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.61
Susie Valls
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.45
Suzanne Mesko
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gricel Boto Bernales + Bianca Alvarez5554% games+12.2% vs expected
Gricel Boto Bernales + Susie Valls16854% games−1.1% vs expected
Bianca Alvarez + NATALI SPILBERG8354% games−4.4% vs expected
Loren Levine + Susie Valls21039% gamesnot enough data
Loren Levine + Mirella Sprinckmoller2351% gamesnot enough data
Mirella Sprinckmoller + Susie Valls2340% gamesnot enough data
Gricel Boto Bernales + NATALI SPILBERG134 matchesnot enough data
Angela Jimenez + Susie Valls033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Natasha Torres
155W–75L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
4.45
4.5
Alexandra Santoro
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
NATALI SPILBERG
59W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Bianca Alvarez
181W–133L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Angela Jimenez
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
4.14
4.5
Cynthia Carolina Hernandez Romero
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Gricel Boto Bernales
343W–260L career · 4 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
4.09
4.5
Hermine Greene
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
4.01
4
Daniela Hernandez
32W–32L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
4.5
Ellen Raskin
40W–70L career · 5 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.92
Marie Valdes
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
3.86
4.5
Daniela Pastore
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
3.81
4
Mirella Sprinckmoller
76W–63L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Loren Levine
246W–175L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Susie Valls
118W–209L career · 4 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.61
4
Brooke Schnittman
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.45
Suzanne Mesko
4W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.