Teams

SFV - Porter Valley

2022 Mixed 18 & Over - SFV · SFV 18 & Over - 8.0 MxD

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-03-20vs SFV - Up Your AlleyLost 01
L#2 DoublesJeff Bailes / Michele Venegas vs Deepak Antony / Jennifer Soukup1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-03-12vs SFV - Team Serve Ace AahsWon 10
W#2 DoublesDhruv Sareen / Michele Venegas vs John Maly / Judy Maly6-3, 6-4
2022-02-20vs SFV - AV StormersLost 02
L#2 DoublesNeil Patak / Michele Venegas vs Carlos Guarin / S Rose Postal - (DQ)*1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSteve Kim / Kendra Corrigan vs Alan Esguerra / Miranda Prescott1-6, 4-6
2022-02-12vs SFV - Rocket RacketsWon 10
W#3 DoublesYvette McDuff / Dhruv Sareen vs Rosie Casillas / Ian Gocka7-6, 6-3
2022-01-22vs SFV - Just EnjoyLost 01
L#2 DoublesDhruv Sareen / Michele Venegas vs Hanre Chang / Tina Yang2-6, 6-7
2022-01-09vs SFV - Warner Red DemonsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesEvan Press / Michele Venegas vs Eric Harris / Michelle Halpern2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKent Goss / Kendra Corrigan vs Guy Vidal / Karen Vidal6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - 8.0 MxD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Dhruv Sareen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.06
Shane Duffy
published
4.03
Evan Press
published 4.5
3.99
Chad Fenwick
published 4
3.92
Neil Patak
published
3.89
Maureen Shideh
published
Consuelo Hayden
published 3.5
3.20
Michele Venegas
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jeff Bailes
published
Kendra Corrigan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 0
Kent Goss
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michele Venegas + Dhruv Sareen5355% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dhruv Sareen
71W–45L career · 3 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
4.14
Shane Duffy
25W–21L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
4.06
4.5
Evan Press
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
4.03
4
Chad Fenwick
12W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.99
Neil Patak
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
74%26%<1%
3.92
Maureen Shideh
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.89
3.5
Consuelo Hayden
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Michele Venegas
97W–95L career · 9 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Jeff Bailes
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
0
Kendra Corrigan
57W–48L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kent Goss
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.