Teams

McMullen Halm

2022 Pinellas Adult 40 & Over Spring Weekend · 3.5 M Saturday

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-06-11vs Racquet Club RoguesWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndrew DePasquale / Christopher Patterson vs Kevin Fantauzzo / Jamie Dennis7-5, 7-6
2022-06-04vs Pinellas/BettencourtWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndrew DePasquale / Christopher Patterson vs Philip Noll / Michael Vanhorenbeck7-6, 6-3
2022-05-14vs Seminole Lake DsaLost 01
L#2 DoublesPaul Solorzano / Andrew DePasquale vs John Ramdeen / Jose Dsa1-6, 4-6
2022-05-07vs SPTC Holliday 3.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesAndrew DePasquale / Joseph Flaherty vs WAYNE SMITH / Jeffrey Rogo3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2022-04-30vs Racquet Club RoguesLost 02
L#2 DoublesChristopher Patterson / Andrew DePasquale vs Kevin Fantauzzo / Joe Faraci3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristopher Wyman / Paul Solorzano vs Jamie Dennis / Cebron Walker7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2022-04-23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrew DePasquale / Paul Solorzano vs Kyle Valby / Robert Hill6-7, 0-6
2022-04-09vs Seminole Lake DsaLost 01
L#2 DoublesAndrew DePasquale / Christopher Patterson vs Chris Pruitt - (DQ)* / Jose Dsa4-6, 3-6
2022-04-02vs SPTC Holliday 3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesAndrew DePasquale / Paul Solorzano vs Khuat Do / Robert Sinclair6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
3.45
Brandon Halm
published 3.5
3.43
Joseph Flaherty
published
3.30
Andrew DePasquale
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
George Hawkins
published 3.5
3.00
Paul Solorzano
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Kyle Robertshaw
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew DePasquale + Christopher Patterson5158% games+2.9% vs expected
Andrew DePasquale + Paul Solorzano191851% games−3.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Edwin Alejandro-Vega
8W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Brandon Halm
26W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.45
Joseph Flaherty
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Andrew DePasquale
105W–71L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Christopher Patterson
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
George Hawkins
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Paul Solorzano
69W–49L career · 4 lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.00
Kyle Robertshaw
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.