Teams

Brown, Patrick

2025 Combo 40 & Over-JXN · Men 6.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-16vs Coins, JimmieLost 01
L#3 DoublesPatrick Brown / Jim Davis vs Aquilino Escaner / Derrick Jones6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-10-14vs Sahoo, JitendraWon 10
W#3 DoublesPatrick Brown / Carlas Davis vs Brad Benton / Jeffrey Silberblatt0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-02vs Pace, PhillipWon 10
W#1 DoublesPatrick Brown / Don Roberts vs Mitch Stentiford / Steven Patterson3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-09-18vs Sahoo, JitendraWon 10
W#3 DoublesPatrick Brown / Jim Davis vs Danny Lynch / Chad Feldman6-1, 7-6
2025-09-11vs Wilson, RobertLost 03
L#1 DoublesDon Roberts / William Hill vs Jerry Farr / Kristopher Hamel1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSteven Szabo / Jim Davis vs Greg McNair / William Rinehart1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPat Baldwin / Michael Lang vs Albert Weeks / Wade Hawkins3-6, 5-7
2025-09-04vs Merchant, TomLost 01
L#1 DoublesPatrick Brown / Mark Huff vs Jeremy Self / Philip Cothern2-6, 2-6
2025-08-07vs Wilson, RobertLost 12
L#1 DoublesSteven Szabo / Carlas Davis vs Greg McNair / William Rinehart3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJohn Chow / Jim Davis vs Thomas Lister / Jimmy Johnson6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJay Lake / Michael Lang vs James Moseley / Marcello Gambino Meriles4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
John Chow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Patrick Brown
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.09
Jay Lake
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Michael Lang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Don Roberts
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Jim Davis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Carlas Davis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Mark Huff
published
2.64
Pat Baldwin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Don Roberts + Carlas Davis5352% games−8.2% vs expected
Michael Lang + Jay Lake0734% games−15.0% vs expected
John Chow + Jim Davis134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Chow
7W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.12
3.5
Patrick Brown
68W–131L career · 5 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Jay Lake
2W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
Michael Lang
1W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Don Roberts
14W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%5%
2.78
Jim Davis
9W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Carlas Davis
18W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
Mark Huff
6W–19L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.65
Pat Baldwin
4W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.