Teams

CVTA RED

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-04vs CVTA SILVERLost 02
L#1 DoublesMara Frazier / Colleen Weaverling vs Nicole Winterton / Elowyn Rich0-3
L#1 SinglesSarah Abernathey vs Bethany Sartell4-6, 5-7
2023-08-28vs BCC REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesMara Frazier / Colleen Weaverling vs Cindy Keith / Maria Lorenzo Sachs7-5, 6-3
2023-08-21vs LTA-Q SILVERSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMara Frazier / Colleen Weaverling vs Ruta Cariov / Rebekah Harvey3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Abernathey vs Sherry Cree6-2, 6-0
2023-08-14vs LAC SILVERSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMara Frazier / Colleen Weaverling vs Natalie Gilbert / Julie Obrien7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSarah Abernathey vs Rebecca Negrete4-6, 2-6
2023-08-07vs BTA-C GREENLost 01
L#1 SinglesJenny Bach vs Carolyn Baker7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2023-08-05vs CVTA SILVERSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJenny Bach vs Jenna Prey4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesColleen Weaverling / Sarah Abernathey vs Melissa Balcerak / Laurie Harris6-4, 6-4
2023-07-24vs BCC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesMara Frazier / Colleen Weaverling vs Alison Miller / Joyce Porreca6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSarah Abernathey vs Elba Horrocks6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJenny Bach / Ann Larson vs Julie Kopp / Susan Williams5-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Jenny Bach
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Sarah Abernathey
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.20
Kathy Lowenstein
published
3.10
Linda Levy
published
3.09
Colleen Weaverling
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Janet Ryden
published
Mary Fitzgibbon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Abernathey + Colleen Weaverling3645% games−2.9% vs expected
Colleen Weaverling + Linda Levy134 matchesnot enough data
Linda Levy + Janet Ryden123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jenny Bach
37W–52L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Sarah Abernathey
41W–49L career · 5 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
Kathy Lowenstein
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Linda Levy
11W–30L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Colleen Weaverling
45W–87L career · type A · 6 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.09
Janet Ryden
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Fitzgibbon
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.