Teams

Campassi- MTC Combo 55+

2025 Combo 55 & Over-EC · Women 6.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-15vs Spradling 55+ 6.5 ComboWon 21
W#1 DoublesMissy Brown / Patricia Faver vs Lynn Moorehead / Kevin Voller6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTammy Gavin / Angela White vs Kathy Kelly / Dawn Branton3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDebbie Monroe / Patti Stanley vs Maggie Hamilton / Christy Dickerson6-4, 6-4
2025-09-08vs Spradling 55+ 6.5 ComboWon 21
W#1 DoublesCyndi Sullivan / Patricia Faver vs Maggie Hamilton / Dawn Branton6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBette Rhea / Edith Faulkner vs Kathy Kelly / Claire Spradling2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCatherine van Asselt / Angela White vs Lynn Moorehead / Kathryn Laughlin6-1, 6-4
2025-09-02vs Spradling 55+ 6.5 ComboLost 12
L#1 DoublesCatherine van Asselt / Allyson Jones vs Maggie Hamilton / Linda Acy1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCyndi Sullivan / Patti Stanley vs Cheryl Andrews / Dawn Branton7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMissy Brown / Edith Faulkner vs Kathy Kelly / Claire Spradling1-6, 0-6
2025-08-21vs Spradling 55+ 6.5 ComboWon 21
W#1 DoublesHelen Campassi / Catherine van Asselt vs Cheryl Andrews / Linda Acy6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDebbie Monroe / Allyson Jones vs Laura Hodges / Kathryn Laughlin6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPatti Stanley / Tammy Gavin vs Maggie Hamilton / Christy Dickerson6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-08-18vs Spradling 55+ 6.5 ComboLost 12
L#1 DoublesBette Rhea / Allyson Jones vs Pam Corban / Kevin Voller4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCatherine van Asselt / Helen Campassi vs Kathy Kelly / Lucy Senter6-3, 2-0
L#3 DoublesCyndi Sullivan / Angela White vs Laura Hodges / Dawn Branton1-6, 2-6
2025-08-13vs Spradling 55+ 6.5 ComboWon 30
W#1 DoublesHelen Campassi / Catherine van Asselt vs Lynn Moorehead / Christy Dickerson7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPatti Stanley / Tammy Gavin vs Cheryl Andrews / Linda Acy2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatricia Faver / Debbie Monroe vs Maggie Hamilton / Dawn Branton6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bette Rhea
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Catherine van Asselt
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.96
Patti Stanley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.85
Debbie Monroe
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Angela White
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Helen Campassi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Edith Faulkner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.58
Patricia Faver
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Missy Brown
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Tammy Gavin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bette Rhea + Catherine van Asselt7551% games+2.8% vs expected
Angela White + Edith Faulkner3250% games−3.3% vs expected
Catherine van Asselt + Helen Campassi314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bette Rhea
9W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Catherine van Asselt
25W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patti Stanley
52W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
3.5
Debbie Monroe
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
2.85
3
Angela White
18W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Helen Campassi
6W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Edith Faulkner
10W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
2.59
Patricia Faver
14W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
Missy Brown
30W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tammy Gavin
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.