Teams

SDNC 4.0 RPTC (2:3)/ Garrison

2024 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SDNC WD · SDNC - Women - 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
L#2 DoublesNorma Garrison / Sara Ackley vs Becky Ness / Ronda Smyth2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNorma Garrison / Devera Marshall vs Heather Kowieski / Catherine Pla6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSara Ackley / Norma Garrison vs Sarena Talbert / Lawson Talbert1-6, 4-6
2024-06-07vs SDNC 4.0 FRCC (3:2)/ TexieraLost 01
L#1 DoublesSara Ackley / Susan Gehrke vs Dana Moskowitz / Kendal Texeira3-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesTeri Smelik / Devera Marshall vs Wendy Burgoon / Lauri Khazraei2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSara Ackley / Susan Hong vs Jenelle Aris / Berkley Bowers2-6, 5-7
2024-05-03vs SDNC 4.0 La Valle CC (3:2)/ DunnLost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa Erickson / Devera Marshall vs Lin Sherman / Maeve Brick6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2024-04-28vs SDNC 4.0 FRCC (3:2)/ MatteiWon 10
W#2 DoublesCindy S Miers / Sara Ackley vs Ranelle Kain / Kimberly Krenek6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-04-19vs SDNC 4.0 La Costa (3:2)/ PotterSplit 11
L#2 DoublesTatiana Vaschenko / Sara Ackley vs Erin Holl / Susan Potter2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDevera Marshall / Teri Smelik vs Elizabeth Nunez / Holly Weber6-2, 6-1
2024-04-12vs SDNC 4.0 RBCTC (2:3)/ FisherSplit 11
L#1 SinglesDevera Marshall vs Sheri Ortiz3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSara Ackley / Susan Hong vs Dasha Safarik / Christi McClain6-3, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Susan Hong
published
3.87
Sara Ackley
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
Deborah Parks
published 4
3.65
Cindy S Miers
published 4
3.56
Amy Huber
published 4
3.52
Devera Marshall
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.52
Nelda Swanson
published
3.34
Robin Daynes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Ackley + Cindy S Miers4549% games−10.8% vs expected
Sara Ackley + Nelda Swanson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Hong
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.94
4
Sara Ackley
67W–57L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Deborah Parks
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Cindy S Miers
25W–42L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Amy Huber
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.56
4
Devera Marshall
34W–55L career · 5 lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.52
Nelda Swanson
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
Robin Daynes
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%11%
3.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.