Teams

SAN JOSE SR 40AW3.5A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-24vs BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 40AW3.5DLost 01
L#3 DoublesPauline Teunissen / Janice Altknecht vs Marnie Mar / Debby Heicklen1-6, 0-6
2025-01-09vs BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 40AW3.5DWon 10
W#3 DoublesPauline Teunissen / Jing Welch vs Jeanette Dayan / Andrea Coleman6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Pauline Teunissen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Lisa Baumert
published
3.22
Jane Ensor
published
3.21
Janet Arsenault
published
3.20
Dana Knapp
published 3.5
3.19
Amanda Holmquist
published 3.5
3.13
Barbara Westergren
published 3.5
3.13
Jan Immer
published
3.01
Sheila Hutchinson
published
2.82
Katharine Heintz
published
Ashley Pass
published 3
2.72
Amanda Ramos
published 3
2.40
Eunyoung Feucht
published
Sherry Keogh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pauline Teunissen + Lisa Baumert2443% games−9.0% vs expected
Sheila Hutchinson + Katharine Heintz134 matchesnot enough data
Dana Knapp + Lisa Baumert314 matchesnot enough data
Jan Immer + Amanda Ramos033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pauline Teunissen
21W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
Lisa Baumert
34W–33L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
Jane Ensor
11W–13L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Janet Arsenault
9W–11L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Dana Knapp
15W–18L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Amanda Holmquist
2W–21L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Barbara Westergren
6W–17L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Jan Immer
2W–17L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Sheila Hutchinson
13W–30L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
Katharine Heintz
8W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Ashley Pass
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Amanda Ramos
10W–28L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Eunyoung Feucht
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%76%24%
2.40
Sherry Keogh
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.