Teams

SunPro-Thorpe/Chamberlain

2025 Fall Indoor League-Weekday · 3.5W

18 players · average NTRP 3.29 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-12-10vs Wasatch Rec Center-Wade/StoneLost 13
L#1 DoublesCori Duke / Cari Cardall vs Jennifer Davies / Jennifer Stone1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesBreckan Humiston vs Jennifer Mcbride7-6, 3-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHaley Cook / Christine Gouff vs Jocelyn Bennion / Jen Dagley2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLiz Donaldson / Brook Gotberg vs Lisa Olson / Wendy Heywood4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-11-18vs Team LowellLost 13
L#1 DoublesCori Duke / Sandra Chamberlain vs Lisa Michie / Abby Waldrip6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAlison Carlile vs Melissa Pennock4-6, 3-4
W#2 DoublesJennifer Hoffman / Jana Okey vs Kelli Lowell / Angela Woods7-5, 4-2
L#3 DoublesVictoria Daughetee / Cari Cardall vs Elizabeth Lohner / Lisa Hart4-6, 3-4
2025-11-11vs Sunpro Parker/StringhamLost 02
L#1 DoublesCori Duke / Sandra Chamberlain vs Michelle Hansen / Jennifer Stringham4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesClaire Hatch / Jana Okey vs Liz Rowley / Denise Daniels2-6, 3-6
2025-11-04vs Heber Valley-Wood/OvertonWon 30
W#1 DoublesHaley Cook / Chrissy Oliveros vs Mindi Finlayson / Carly Johnston6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKristi Lund vs Megan Overton3-6, 6-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesVictoria Daughetee / Sandra Chamberlain vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings16 teams · 3.5W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sunpro Parker/Stringham6020414157
2Ogden-Andersen5115919182
3SunPro-Barber/Curtis5116819165
4Sports Mall-Lake/Knowlton5117720180
5Sports Mall-Farr/Green4217718178
6Ivory Ridge-Adams/Riley4215921187
7Liberty Park-Creamer/Maxfield4216824195
8Wasatch Rec Center-Wade/Stone33131126198
9Team Lowell33101430207
10Pumpkin Smashers-Leishman/Ewing3391533212
11Ivory Ridge-Hardin/Elison2481636229
12Sports Mall-Wood1571735230
13SunPro-Thorpe/Chamberlain1581636234
14SL Tennis Spinners1581636234
15Ace Athletics-Harmon1542040238
16Heber Valley-Wood/Overton0661839247

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Alivia Winkel
published 3.5
3.34
Rachel Gouff
published 3.5
3.27
Alison Carlile
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Breckan Humiston
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Jennifer Hoffman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Victoria Daughetee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Brook Gotberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Haley Cook
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.95
Jana Okey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.93
Sandra Chamberlain
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.92
Cori Duke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.89
Cari Cardall
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.85
Liz Donaldson
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.82
Laura Thorpe
published
2.81
Chrissy Oliveros
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Claire Hatch
published 3
2.73
Christine Gouff
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Kristi Lund
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cari Cardall + Jana Okey3253% games+10.0% vs expected
Laura Thorpe + Chrissy Oliveros6456% games+9.3% vs expected
Cari Cardall + Sandra Chamberlain8163% games+8.5% vs expected
Chrissy Oliveros + Liz Donaldson3448% games+7.0% vs expected
Sandra Chamberlain + Jennifer Hoffman3350% games+5.7% vs expected
Rachel Gouff + Christine Gouff71152% games+4.1% vs expected
Liz Donaldson + Cari Cardall91346% games+3.0% vs expected
Cori Duke + Sandra Chamberlain1444% games+0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alivia Winkel
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
3.38
3.5
Rachel Gouff
9W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Alison Carlile
19W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Breckan Humiston
6W–8L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Jennifer Hoffman
62W–57L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Victoria Daughetee
10W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Brook Gotberg
4W–11L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.08
Haley Cook
5W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
3
Jana Okey
53W–43L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
3.5
Sandra Chamberlain
84W–85L career · 3 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
2.93
3.5
Cori Duke
7W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.92
3
Cari Cardall
64W–90L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Liz Donaldson
74W–88L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Laura Thorpe
50W–69L career · no lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.82
3
Chrissy Oliveros
77W–89L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Claire Hatch
1W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Christine Gouff
54W–82L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Kristi Lund
49W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.