Teams

Serving Love

2022 DC WTA Adult 40 & Over Winter · DC WTA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-03-26vs Serve OnLost 03
L#1 DoublesClaris Brock / Teri Hudson vs Ami Chastain / Angela Goodman2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSohee Chu vs Cindy Mathys0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAriel Selwyn / Lisa Steel vs Kimberly Mielcarek / Susan Donegan1-6, 5-7
2022-03-19vs LoVVWon 21
L#1 DoublesPamela Christian Wilson / Kimberlee Overdeck vs Julie Gowin / Susan Maier0-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesSohee Chu vs Kim Dowd6-2, 4-3
W#2 DoublesKathy Crowley / Nancy Siems vs LISA GRIMES / Mia Piansay6-3, 5-4
2022-03-12vs 40 LOVELost 03
L#1 DoublesKimberlee Overdeck / Donna Fitzgerald vs Jamaine Chisholm / Sharon Tompkins0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesNancy Siems vs Jemine Bryon5-7, 2-1
L#2 DoublesClaris Brock / Courtney Watson vs Cecilia Jones / Katya White6-7, 0-3
2022-03-05vs Serve OnLost 12
L#1 DoublesRosalie Hooper / Claris Brock vs Pilar Falo / Kimberly Mielcarek1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesSohee Chu vs Cindy Mathys6-7, 4-2
L#2 DoublesKathy Crowley / Ariel Selwyn vs Susan Donegan / Heidi Schriefer4-6, 3-6
2022-02-26vs LoVVSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDonna Fitzgerald / Lisa Steel vs LISA GRIMES / Susan Maier3-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSohee Chu vs Mia Piansay6-2, 6-1
2022-02-12vs 40 LOVELost 03
L#1 DoublesKathy Crowley / Autumn Kramer vs Sharon Tompkins / Jenni Bae1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesCourtney Watson vs Kristin Quackenbush3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPamela Christian Wilson / Kimberlee Overdeck vs Miriam Ostria / Caridad Coto2-6, 1-6
2022-02-05vs Serve OnLost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Siems / Rosalie Hooper vs Pilar Falo / Brita Robinson4-6, 4-5
L#1 SinglesAriel Selwyn vs Dana Chladek1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesClaris Brock / Teri Hudson vs Susan Donegan / Tamara Lindquist6-7, 2-6
2022-01-29vs LoVVWon 21
W#1 DoublesClaris Brock / Teri Hudson vs Wendy Beale / Stacey Carey6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSohee Chu vs Mia Piansay6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKimberlee Overdeck / Lisa Steel vs Christine Bragale / Dannielle Freeman3-6, 4-6
2022-01-22vs 40 LOVELost 03
L#1 DoublesKathy Crowley / Nancy Siems vs Katya White / Susan Lapetina0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAriel Selwyn vs Kristin Quackenbush6-7, 1-1
L#2 DoublesDonna Fitzgerald / Rosalie Hooper vs Jamaine Chisholm / Caridad Coto2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for DC WTA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Sohee Chu
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.72
Kimberlee Overdeck
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Kathy Crowley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.65
Ariel Selwyn
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.46
Claris Brock
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.43
Teri Hudson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.35
Lisa Steel
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Courtney Watson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Donna Fitzgerald
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Rosalie Hooper
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.01
Pamela Christian Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Autumn Kramer
published
Nancy Siems
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teri Hudson + Claris Brock7550% games+0.3% vs expected
Kimberlee Overdeck + Claris Brock314 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Steel + Donna Fitzgerald224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sohee Chu
141W–149L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Kimberlee Overdeck
81W–132L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
Kathy Crowley
15W–34L career · 4 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Ariel Selwyn
7W–16L career · 4 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
3.5
Claris Brock
420W–275L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.46
4
Teri Hudson
129W–96L career · 3 lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
3.43
Lisa Steel
45W–43L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Courtney Watson
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Donna Fitzgerald
11W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Rosalie Hooper
188W–181L career · 3 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Pamela Christian Wilson
6W–14L career · 2 lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.01
Autumn Kramer
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Siems
7W–6L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.