Teams

Woodlands Harper's Landing - Baseline Mafia

*2026 Houston Fall League (2025)NA- Wednesday Ladies Singles · 3.5 Ladies

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-12vs LLTC - Smash Hit SinglesLost 04
L#1 SinglesPATRICIA WHITENIGHT vs Emmeline Colmenares6-7, 5-7
L#2 SinglesVenera Klaus vs An Phan3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 SinglesJessica Llamas vs Nancy Gonzalez2-6, 1-6
L#4 SinglesPaola Tucker vs Haley Golden2-6, 4-6
2025-10-29vs LLTC - Love HurtsWon 31
W#1 SinglesAksana Rajput vs Joy Hill3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesVenera Klaus vs Heather Watkins6-4, 7-6
W#3 SinglesJessica Llamas vs Annabelle Bitter6-4, 6-3
L#4 SinglesChiara Bufacchi vs Kellie Metcalf3-6, 4-6
2025-10-22vs Missouri City - Serves you RightWon 40
W#1 SinglesKristin Slay vs Joyce Garza7-6, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAraceli Schmaltz vs ALLYSON HILL6-3, 7-5
W#3 SinglesChiara Bufacchi vs Ilham Dib7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#4 SinglesPATRICIA WHITENIGHT vs MELODY CHANTHAVONGSY6-0, 6-2
2025-10-15vs Homer Ford - Love JoyWon 31
L#1 SinglesZema Struve vs Colette Burns5-7, 6-7
W#2 SinglesJessica Llamas vs Meggan Gittens6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAraceli Schmaltz vs Alison West6-3, 6-2
W#4 SinglesVenera Klaus vs Aminata Steele6-3, 6-4
2025-10-12vs Royal Oaks - Singles SlayersWon 21
W#1 SinglesLydia Sims vs Andee Marshall6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesZema Struve vs Cindy Trevino3-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesAraceli Schmaltz vs Mary Catherine Urban6-0, 6-3
2025-10-01vs HFTC - Drop Shot DragonsSplit 22
W#1 SinglesKristin Slay vs Mary Margaret McCormick6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesLydia Sims vs BONNIE HORTON6-1, 6-1
L#3 SinglesZema Struve vs Katie Brisbois4-6, 6-7
L#4 SinglesVenera Klaus vs Haley Holsen6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-09-17Won 10
W#2 SinglesLydia Sims vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 3.5 Ladies
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lost Forest000000
2players - ref000000
3Lost Forest - ref000000
4Cross Creek - Tennis Stars0591125181
5Missouri City - Serves you Right06111327196
6Royal Oaks - Singles Slayers0632142268
7Woodlands Harper's Landing - Baseline Mafia0719921196
8HFTC - Drop Shot Dragons07171128246
9Homer Ford - Love Joy0791939279

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Lydia Sims
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.48
Kristin Slay
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.39
Karen Harvie
published
3.39
Aksana Rajput
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Zema Struve
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.23
Venera Klaus
usually #4 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.23
PATRICIA WHITENIGHT
usually #4 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.23
Paola Tucker
usually #4 Singles 100% · published
3.19
Araceli Schmaltz
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
NOOR FERRELL
published
3.04
Chiara Bufacchi
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #4 Singles 50% · published 3
2.90
Jessica Llamas
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aksana Rajput + Zema Struve6167% games+19.3% vs expected
Paola Tucker + PATRICIA WHITENIGHT5252% games+4.2% vs expected
Kristin Slay + Karen Harvie2349% gamesnot enough data
NOOR FERRELL + Chiara Bufacchi5061% gamesnot enough data
Karen Harvie + Venera Klaus134 matchesnot enough data
Araceli Schmaltz + Karen Harvie123 matchesnot enough data
Araceli Schmaltz + PATRICIA WHITENIGHT123 matchesnot enough data
Paola Tucker + Kristin Slay303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lydia Sims
18W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.56
Kristin Slay
21W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
Karen Harvie
39W–30L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Aksana Rajput
34W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
Zema Struve
22W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Venera Klaus
15W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
PATRICIA WHITENIGHT
59W–47L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.23
Paola Tucker
41W–43L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.23
3.5
Araceli Schmaltz
29W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
NOOR FERRELL
11W–11L career · no lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.10
3
Chiara Bufacchi
11W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.04
Jessica Llamas
39W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.