Teams

LAFE-Feinberg/Jetton 40+ 6.5

2024 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Men 6.5 Wed PM

10 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-08vs LJFE-Fernandez/CSDLost 01
L#1 DoublesRichard Dandurand / Adam Feinberg vs Jeffrey McCue / Bradford Powell1-6, 2-6
2024-09-18vs LJLA-Lands/NMPWon 10
W#3 DoublesSam Yin / John Lesher vs Todd Krieg / Keith MacVean6-3, 6-3
2024-09-11vs LDFU-Fuerst/JettonLost 01
L#1 DoublesRichard Dandurand / John Lesher vs Ben Holden / Steve Hogg2-6, 2-6
2024-09-04vs LJSC-Schoenrock/Westport 6.5 ComboSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSam Yin / Brody Smith vs Brady Sebok / Bae Simalayvong6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRichard Dandurand / Michael DiPietro vs Jason Schoenrock / Kurt Lueck4-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesBrody Smith / Sam Yin vs Craig Lieb / Ted Gibson6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2024-08-21vs LBKI-King/PeninsulaLost 02
L#1 DoublesSam Yin / Michael DiPietro vs Brent King / Bryan Shaughnessy4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Lesher / Richard Dandurand vs Louis Foreman / Mark Mizicko5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2024-08-14vs LBWA-Ward/River Run 40+ 6.5 WedWon 10
W#2 DoublesRichard Dandurand / Walter Rodriguez vs Jacob Grathwohl / Jonathan Ridgway6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 6.5 Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Richard Dandurand
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.29
William Wingo
published
3.26
Brody Smith
published 3
3.01
Russell Swift
published
3.00
John Lesher
published
2.96
Sam Yin
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.92
Shabari Kandasami
published
2.89
Al Solis
published 3
2.58
Adam Feinberg
published 3
Walter Rodriguez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Russell Swift + Adam Feinberg1440% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Richard Dandurand
81W–103L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
William Wingo
8W–13L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3
Brody Smith
21W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%3%97%
3.26
Russell Swift
7W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.01
John Lesher
9W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Sam Yin
49W–48L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
2.96
Shabari Kandasami
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Al Solis
8W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Adam Feinberg
4W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
2.58
Walter Rodriguez
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.