Teams

2-EBlount-HR

2024 Eno River Combo 55 & Over · 55 & Over Combo 8.5 Men Evening

11 players · average NTRP 4.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-09-30vs 1-BBlackburn-CHTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesHien Jimmy Nguyen / Scott Beddingfield vs Zoltan Nyiri / Kenneth Phares6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesErik J Erikson / Phil Korest vs BRYAN WRIGHT / Alexis Maklakoff6-2, 6-3
2024-09-23vs 1-BBlackburn-CHTCWon 10
W#2 DoublesLouie Sasser / Phil Korest vs Greg Fitts / Chris Combs7-5, 6-1
2024-09-22vs 1-BBlackburn-CHTCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEddie Blount / Mark Stone vs Wendell Gilland / Chris Combs2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesLouie Sasser / Scott Beddingfield vs BRYAN WRIGHT / John Proctor7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2024-09-09vs 1-BBlackburn-CHTCLost 01
L#2 DoublesHien Jimmy Nguyen / Scott Beddingfield vs Alexis Maklakoff / Wendell Gilland6-7, 4-6
2024-08-12vs 1-BBlackburn-CHTCWon 10
W#3 DoublesEddie Blount / Mark Stone vs Chris Combs / Kenneth Phares6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Combo 8.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Erik J Erikson
published 4.5
4.10
David Slack
published 4.5
3.86
3.80
Edward Anderson
published 4
Greg Matera
published 4
3.66
Eddie Blount
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.57
Phil Korest
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.49
Scott Beddingfield
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Carl Rist
published
Mike Hoekstra
published
Todd Ballenger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Beddingfield + Phil Korest213 matchesnot enough data
Eddie Blount + Phil Korest033 matchesnot enough data
Erik J Erikson + Phil Korest213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Erik J Erikson
32W–13L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
4.24
4.5
David Slack
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
4.10
4
Hien Jimmy Nguyen
43W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Edward Anderson
28W–30L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Greg Matera
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Eddie Blount
42W–45L career · type S · 2 lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
3.66
4
Phil Korest
43W–41L career · 5 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.57
4
Scott Beddingfield
64W–75L career · 5 lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
3.49
Carl Rist
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mike Hoekstra
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Todd Ballenger
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.