Teams

Ross - RS Clay

2024 Escambia Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Combo 18 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-17vs Wilks - RS HardLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Bonsignore / Malu Dunn vs Jennifer Capozzoli / Michelle Davis2-6, 2-6
2024-12-16vs Koontz - PACWon 10
W#1 DoublesOliva Smith / Kathy Ross vs Gloria Langan / Debra Neethling7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2024-12-03vs Schweigert - PCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmatul Bean / Oliva Smith vs Denise Prindiville / Valerie Wilson1-6, 3-6
2024-11-26vs Wilks - RS HardSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSusan Bonsignore / Alexandra Slobodian vs Maggie Lochas / Jennifer Capozzoli6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesOliva Smith / Kathy Ross vs Thuy Nguyen / Wendi Best3-6, 0-6
2024-11-12vs Koontz - PACLost 01
L#3 DoublesAmatul Bean / Oliva Smith vs Yvonne Burnette / Jennifer McCurdy6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2024-10-22vs Tan - SHLLost 01
L#1 DoublesKathy Ross / Susan Bonsignore vs Sophie Rudman / Courtney Cobia0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Brooklyn Meadows
published 3.5
3.23
Amatul Bean
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Susan Bonsignore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Sally Bergosh
published
3.02
Cheryl Vann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Oliva Smith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.00
Kadi Taylor
published
2.86
Kathy Ross
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Alexandra Slobodian
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Malu Dunn
published
Jill Olinick
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Ross + Malu Dunn314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brooklyn Meadows
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Amatul Bean
23W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Susan Bonsignore
98W–94L career · 3 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11
Sally Bergosh
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.03
3.5
Cheryl Vann
18W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
43%56%<1%
3.02
Oliva Smith
15W–15L career · 4 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.02
Kadi Taylor
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.00
Kathy Ross
24W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Alexandra Slobodian
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Malu Dunn
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
2.64
Jill Olinick
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.