Teams

JTC Lancaster

2025 Alachua Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-06-17vs Alachua/Smith/40&over3.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesPhilip Lancaster / Gregg Fissenden vs Steven Smith / Chris Redding1-6, 3-6
2025-06-12vs Alachua/Torres-Vasquez/40&over3.0MLost 01
L#3 DoublesAttila Bodo / Gregg Fissenden vs Joseph Cox IV / Diwakar Vyas1-6, 1-6
2025-06-10vs DB GerlingWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Stewart / Gregg Fissenden vs Bob Gerling / Zach Randall7-5, 7-6
2025-06-02vs Alachua/Smith/40&over3.0MLost 01
L#1 DoublesPhilip Lancaster / Gregg Fissenden vs Colin Smith / Yury Zasimovich2-6, 0-6
2025-05-23vs DB GerlingWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeff Fox / Philip Lancaster vs Zach Randall / Zhong-Ren Peng7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGary Orr / Gregg Fissenden vs Mehmet Genc / Martin Noguera6-3, 6-2
2025-05-18vs Alachua/Torres-Vasquez/40&over3.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesGregg Fissenden / Philip Lancaster vs Dan Harloff / Joseph Cox IV6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-05-15vs Alachua/Smith/40&over3.0MLost 02
L#2 DoublesJ Brad Case / Gregg Fissenden vs Chris Redding / HEE-SUNG BAE4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesPhilip Lancaster / Dale Gerber vs Shawn Gaston / Sergei Tevosian5-7, 4-6
2025-05-07vs DB GerlingSplit 11
L#2 DoublesGiuseppe Saracino / Brian Kim vs Marc Schnoll / Zach Randall2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGregg Fissenden / John Stewart vs Bob Gerling / Jack Gandolfo3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-27vs Alachua/Torres-Vasquez/40&over3.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesGregg Fissenden / John Stewart vs Alexander Johnson / Anthony Gonzalez3-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
J Brad Case
published
2.97
Jixiu Shan
published
2.88
Gary Orr
published
2.87
Jeff Fox
published
2.75
Mark Bernard
published
2.66
Giuseppe Saracino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Gregg Fissenden
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.58
Philip Lancaster
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.56
Attila Bodo
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Philip Lancaster + Gregg Fissenden11435% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

J Brad Case
17W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.21
Jixiu Shan
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.97
Gary Orr
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.88
Jeff Fox
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
2.87
Mark Bernard
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Giuseppe Saracino
23W–35L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%1%
2.66
3
Gregg Fissenden
24W–83L career · 9 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
3
Philip Lancaster
90W–227L career · 5 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
3
Attila Bodo
0W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.