Teams

New Territory - Slice Girls

2025 HTA Spring NA - Ladies Doubles Friday · 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
L#1 DoublesClaudia Bravo Becerra / Caroline Champion vs Kerri Ross / Viviana Corredor0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMaria Fernanda Aller / Karin Thornton vs Luana Pereira / Britny Trevino0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Carothers / Ulker ERBIL vs Lori Hanish / Kelly Kinch3-6, 5-7
L#4 DoublesJennifer Blackmer / Noune Kirakosian vs Jessica Melchor / Joy Zheng4-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesConnie Esposito / Janet Beaver vs Monica Rayburn / Britny Trevino1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesClaudia Bravo Becerra / Noune Kirakosian vs Kerri Ross / Joanne Hresko2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Blackmer / Sheri Dempsey vs Rebecca Wells / Cassie Oppman6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Janet Beaver
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Karen Carothers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Claudia Bravo Becerra
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Connie Esposito
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Sheri Dempsey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Jennifer Blackmer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.12
Caroline Champion
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Maria Fernanda Aller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Noune Kirakosian
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Karin Thornton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ulker ERBIL
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Connie Esposito + Janet Beaver10652% games+3.7% vs expected
Jennifer Blackmer + Sheri Dempsey134 matchesnot enough data
Connie Esposito + Caroline Champion033 matchesnot enough data
Claudia Bravo Becerra + Maria Fernanda Aller303 matchesnot enough data
Noune Kirakosian + Jennifer Blackmer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janet Beaver
67W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
Karen Carothers
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Claudia Bravo Becerra
14W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Connie Esposito
39W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Sheri Dempsey
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Jennifer Blackmer
12W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Caroline Champion
19W–50L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Maria Fernanda Aller
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Noune Kirakosian
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
Karin Thornton
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.90
Ulker ERBIL
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.