Teams

Wynlakes Payne 40s 4.0

2025 · 2026 Fall USTA Adult 40 & Over Day League - Montgomery

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-11-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesJenni Payne / Monica Kohn vs Kelly Bibb / Lisa Jolly6-1, 6-2
2025-10-15Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAshley Gallion / Micah Morano vs Leah Leal / Erin Bradshaw2-6, 3-6
2025-10-08vs MG Black/SlackLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaura Reyes / Jenni Payne vs Stuart Yelverton / Jessica Carson5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDarlene Skier / Monica Kohn vs Michelle Slack / Leah Leal3-6, 2-6
2025-10-01Won 10
W#3 DoublesMicah Morano / Monica Kohn vs Jennifer Black / Leah Leal6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-09-17Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJennifer Davis / Laura Reyes vs Jennifer Black / Stuart Yelverton7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2026 Fall USTA Adult 40 & Over Day League - Montgomery
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MG Black/Slack4214413131
2Wynlakes Payne 40s 4.02431532203

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Holly Adcock
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.81
Erin Bullington
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.74
Jenni Payne
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
3.73
Jennifer Davis
published 4
3.72
DANITA ALLEN
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.72
Monica Kohn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Ashley Gallion
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.65
Darlene Skier
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.59
Katie Gerst
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.53
Ethel Holladay
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Reyes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Micah Morano
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Davis + Jenni Payne4256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Holly Adcock
13W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.82
Erin Bullington
5W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
Jenni Payne
39W–17L career · 15 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.74
4
Jennifer Davis
66W–70L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
DANITA ALLEN
24W–15L career · 7 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Monica Kohn
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Ashley Gallion
12W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Darlene Skier
17W–15L career · 10 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.65
Katie Gerst
33W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.59
Ethel Holladay
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.53
Laura Reyes
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Micah Morano
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.