Teams

Cheval Tri to Win - M. Schmitt

2023 Hillsborough Tri-Level · 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.58 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-02vs Riverhills - T. ManganelloSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristina Brugger / Heidi Milan vs Shannon Deck / Angela Piche4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Crow / Cornelia Eckert vs Jen O'Leary / Ellie Dahl6-3, 6-1
2023-07-26vs HCC Triple Shots - J. KarpanWon 10
W#1 DoublesCasey Gates / Melany Jablonski vs Carey Watts / Stephanie Wilson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-07-14vs HCC Causing A Racquet - A. FlinterLost 02
L#1 DoublesCasey Gates / Heidi Milan vs Anh Flinter / Jennifer Price4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNatalie Martinez / Kristin McCormick vs Ronghui You / Wenhong Li5-7, 5-7
2023-07-12vs Buckhorn Bananas - D. CunninghamLost 12
W#1 DoublesDiane Jackson / Mary Schmitt vs Arabia Brakefield / Meagan McGill6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKristin McCormick / Fatima Zinober vs Mary Flynn / Deb Spears7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCornelia Eckert / Heather Perpetua vs Tammy Hohman / Danielle Cunningham3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-06-28vs TYCC - L. DreisbachWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristina Brugger / Mary Schmitt vs Anne Butler / Marnie Bauer6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Crow / Danielle Lindblom vs Jacqueline Carricato / Lindsay Davitt6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-14vs HILLS/Paul/Trilevel4.0/3.5/3.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesDiane Jackson / Christina Brugger vs Abbe Malone / Rhonda Mendoza6-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKristin McCormick / Eva de Monet vs Beth Hart / Geri Burke7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Crow / Danielle Lindblom vs Kelley Coffey / Crystal Vanmeter6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Christina Brugger
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.89
Melany Jablonski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Natalie Martinez
published
3.65
Diane Jackson
published 4
3.49
Casey Gates
published 4
3.48
Kristin McCormick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Krista Missbach
published 3.5
3.32
Fatima Zinober
published 3.5
3.22
Heidi Milan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Mary Schmitt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Lisa Crow
published
2.88
Cornelia Eckert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Danielle Lindblom
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Patricia McCullough
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Krista Missbach + Kristin McCormick10557% games+3.8% vs expected
Melany Jablonski + Christina Brugger13660% games+2.1% vs expected
Kristin McCormick + Heidi Milan5155% games−0.1% vs expected
Fatima Zinober + Kristin McCormick5253% games−5.3% vs expected
Diane Jackson + Natalie Martinez4350% games−6.0% vs expected
Danielle Lindblom + Charmaine Wynter Carpenter7840% games−9.3% vs expected
Mary Schmitt + Christina Brugger71542% gamesnot enough data
Mary Schmitt + Heidi Milan0930% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christina Brugger
145W–93L career · 5 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
4.19
4
Melany Jablonski
135W–52L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.89
Natalie Martinez
24W–23L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Diane Jackson
15W–18L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Casey Gates
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
Kristin McCormick
105W–82L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.48
3.5
Krista Missbach
115W–78L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Fatima Zinober
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Heidi Milan
82W–157L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Mary Schmitt
65W–152L career · 2 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
Lisa Crow
14W–17L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Cornelia Eckert
54W–53L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Danielle Lindblom
93W–106L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Charmaine Wynter Carpenter
85W–78L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
2.83
Patricia McCullough
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.