Teams

LAMO-Morris/NMP

2026 Lake Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 8.5 Women 18s

13 players · average NTRP 4.31 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 5 9:00 AM
vs N/A
Andreina Morris
Sep 12 9:00 AM
Jetton Park
Sep 19 9:00 AM
North Mecklenburg Park
Sep 26 9:00 AM
vs N/A
Andreina Morris
Oct 3 9:00 AM
North Mecklenburg Park
Oct 10 9:00 AM
Andreina Morris
2026-08-29vs LJHU-Huggins/CSD spartanWon 21
W#1 DoublesMAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY / Austin Taylor vs Janna Huggins / Bridget Johnson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSunny Bowers / Colleen Beierwaltes vs Christine Richards / Angela Stallman6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesLorna Doucette / Diana West vs Kelly Hallman / Maggie Lawrence0-6, 4-6
2026-08-22vs LTDU-Dunn-McRorie/JettonLost 01
L#1 DoublesAustin Taylor / Hannah Chillag vs Madison Bowen / Marisa Toivonen6-4, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women 18s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.07 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.45
Sunny Bowers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.40
MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.28
Diana West
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.19
Hannah Chillag
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.17
Claudia Vizzini
published 4.5
4.10
Amanda Patrocino
published 4.5
4.05
Andreina Morris
published 4.5
4.04
Colleen Beierwaltes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.01
Irma Laney
published
3.84
Hoa Tran
published
3.80
3.79
Kristen Oliver
published
3.73
Lorna Doucette
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda Patrocino + Colleen Beierwaltes404 matchesnot enough data
MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY + Irma Laney303 matchesnot enough data
Irma Laney + Dora Burdzinska-Drezek213 matchesnot enough data
Kristen Oliver + Andreina Morris123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sunny Bowers
50W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%63%37%
4.45
4.5
MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY
45W–31L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
<1%77%23%
4.40
4.5
Diana West
17W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
4.28
Hannah Chillag
13W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%9%91%
4.19
4.5
Claudia Vizzini
4W–4L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
4.17
4.5
Amanda Patrocino
176W–39L career · no lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
4.10
4.5
Andreina Morris
6W–6L career · no lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
4.05
4
Colleen Beierwaltes
141W–37L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%40%60%
4.04
Irma Laney
28W–13L career · no lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
4.01
Hoa Tran
14W–7L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Dora Burdzinska-Drezek
50W–67L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
Kristen Oliver
29W–18L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Lorna Doucette
24W–36L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.