Teams

Cannon Fodder

2022 65 & Over League · Men 8.0 - 65 & Over

5 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MONTANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-08-28vs Montana/Alexander/65&Over8.0MLost 02
L#2 DoublesJames McCarvel / Dave Richards vs Benjamin Rangel / Bill Walters4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesScott Odegard / Rex Derr vs John Alexander / Richard Ecke4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-08-26vs Montana/Alexander/65&Over8.0MLost 02
L#2 DoublesDave Richards / James McCarvel vs Scott Selstad / Jerry Geiszler4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesScott Odegard / Rex Derr vs Richard Ecke / Dave Runkel4-6, 3-6
2022-08-26vs Montana/Alexander/65&Over8.0MLost 02
L#2 DoublesJames McCarvel / Dave Richards vs Bill Walters / Richard Ecke4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesScott Odegard / Rex Derr vs Benjamin Rangel / Dave Runkel3-6, 4-6
2022-08-25vs Montana/Alexander/65&Over8.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesSteve Clark / Kenneth Runnion vs Paul Larson / Andrew Lenssen1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDave Richards / James McCarvel vs Scott Selstad / Jerry Geiszler4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesScott Odegard / Rex Derr vs John Alexander / Benjamin Rangel4-6, 3-6
2022-08-25vs Montana/Alexander/65&Over8.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesScott Odegard / Rex Derr vs Dave Runkel / Richard Ecke4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDave Richards / James McCarvel vs Benjamin Rangel / Bill Walters6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSteve Clark / Kenneth Runnion vs Paul Larson / Andrew Lenssen1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 8.0 - 65 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Montana/Alexander/65&Over8.0M50150690
2Cannon Fodder0501530173

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Dave Richards
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
James McCarvel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kenneth Runnion
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Rex Derr
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Scott Odegard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James McCarvel + Rex Derr0928% gamesnot enough data
James McCarvel + Dave Richards0548% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dave Richards
31W–10L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.84
3.5
James McCarvel
0W–20L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kenneth Runnion
1W–16L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rex Derr
1W–32L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Scott Odegard
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.