Teams

Socially Awkward

Fall Coed Social League · Discovery Social League

6 players · average NTRP 2.70 / SOUTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-19vs Four of a KindLost 23
L#1 Female DoublesJillian Mcqueen / Mindy Lane vs Rosalee Hermens / Amanda Ferrari2-6
L#1 Female SinglesMindy Lane vs Amanda Ferrari4-6
L#1 Male DoublesEphraim Zuckerman / Ryan Coleman vs Tim Ballard / James Knox0-6
W#1 Male SinglesEphraim Zuckerman vs James Knox6-4
W#2 Mixed DoublesScott Fox / Mindy Lane vs Tim Ballard / Amanda Ferrari6-5
2025-10-18vs Mixed NutsLost 23
L#1 Female DoublesJillian Mcqueen / Mindy Lane vs Jennifer Cox / Jessica Watson1-6
W#1 Female SinglesJillian Mcqueen vs Jennifer Cox6-5
L#1 Male DoublesScott Fox / Ryan Coleman vs Jeff Cox / Jeffrey Shafer5-6
W#1 Male SinglesScott Fox vs Jeff Cox6-4
L#2 Mixed DoublesEphraim Zuckerman / Kathy Gallo vs Jennifer Cox / Jeff Cox5-6
2025-10-18vs Drop It Like It's ShotWon 31
L#1 Female DoublesJillian Mcqueen / Mindy Lane vs Zoe Boger / Kimber Stovesand2-6
W#1 Male DoublesRyan Coleman / Scott Fox vs Joe Goetz / Brent Stovesand6-1
W#1 Male SinglesScott Fox vs Joe Goetz6-1
W#1 Mixed DoublesEphraim Zuckerman / Mindy Lane vs Joe Goetz / Zoe Boger6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Discovery Social League
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Four of a Kind03108864
2Socially Awkward0491515120

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Ryan Coleman
usually #1 Male Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.83
Scott Fox
usually #1 Male Singles 67%, also #2 Mixed Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Ephraim Zuckerman
usually #2 Mixed Doubles 33%, also #1 Mixed Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Jillian Mcqueen
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Female Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.18
Kathy Gallo
published
2.15
Mindy Lane
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Female Singles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Fox + Jillian Mcqueen213 matchesnot enough data
Mindy Lane + Jillian Mcqueen033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Ryan Coleman
4W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.99
3
Scott Fox
13W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Ephraim Zuckerman
15W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
2.5
Jillian Mcqueen
6W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
0%9%91%
2.69
Kathy Gallo
0W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
Mindy Lane
4W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.