Teams

SDNC 4.5 Tri Scripps Ranch- Trails/ Wimmer

2022 SCTA Tri-Level Doubles Summer- SDNC · SDNC Women (4.5

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-08-26vs SDNC 4.5 Tri RBCTC/ CarmichaelWon 10
W#3 DoublesKiersten Bousquet / Jennifer Johnson vs Lidia Rose / Cynthia Noet6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2022-08-12vs SDNC 4.5 Tri Lomas Santa Fe/ LinLost 01
L#3 DoublesKiersten Bousquet / Jean McDonald vs Marissa Moser / Haruko Vajda1-6, 1-6
2022-08-05vs SDNC 4.5 Tri El Camino CC/ GraberLost 01
L#3 DoublesCaresse Muir / Kiersten Bousquet vs Tien Tran / Amie Destremps5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2022-07-28vs SDNC 4.5 Tri RBCTC/ CarmichaelWon 10
W#3 DoublesKiersten Bousquet / Jennifer Johnson vs Lidia Rose / Cynthia Noet6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2022-06-24vs SDNC 4.5 Tri Brengle Terrace/ AlvaLost 01
L#3 DoublesCaresse Muir / Lisa McDonald vs Alena Khoroshansky / Heather Ward2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC Women (4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Kellie Jaquez
published 4.5
4.20
Val Zabaco
published 4.5
3.94
Monika Wimmer
published 4
3.74
Joni Gurrola
published 4
3.33
Jean McDonald
published
3.28
Lisa McDonald
published
3.09
Kiersten Bousquet
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Caresse Muir
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Val Zabaco + Monika Wimmer462256% games+2.1% vs expected
Caresse Muir + Kiersten Bousquet101145% gamesnot enough data
Val Zabaco + Kellie Jaquez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kellie Jaquez
104W–50L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
4.37
4.5
Val Zabaco
102W–57L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.20
4
Monika Wimmer
145W–68L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Joni Gurrola
11W–11L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Jean McDonald
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.33
Lisa McDonald
9W–9L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Kiersten Bousquet
78W–88L career · 4 lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Caresse Muir
64W–78L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.