Teams

Yadkin/Club/18 5.5 Morning

2025 Yadkin Valley Combo 18 & Over · Women 5.5 - Wednesday Morning

13 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesHollan Young / Meg Burr vs Joanna Hamilton / Inge Smith1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Bouchard / Melanie Brost vs Jenny Orr / Kathryn Simpson6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDeana Georgitis / Ellery Day vs Karen Lehman / Ashton Jackson7-5, 6-1
2025-09-17vs Yadkin/Orr/Westwood/18 5.5 MorningLost 12
W#1 DoublesMelanie Brost / Kelly Mcquellon vs Margaret Wray / Inge Smith6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJill Rogers / Ellery Day vs Emily Collins / Debbie Hoover1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLauren Kazakos / Anna Claire Ash vs Dina Maguire / Rebecca Carmichael3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesAshley Givens / Hollan Young vs Joanna Hamilton / Amret Hawfield6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDeana Georgitis / Mary Bouchard vs Margaret Wray / Kathryn Simpson6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKelly Mcquellon / Jill Rogers vs Valerie Berger / Alisa O'grady6-2, 6-2
2025-09-03vs Yadkin/Orr/Westwood/18 5.5 MorningLost 12
L#1 DoublesTammy LaValley / Kelly Mcquellon vs Jenny Orr / Inge Smith5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLauren Kazakos / Ellery Day vs Karen Lehman / Ashton Jackson7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMeg Burr / Anna Claire Ash vs Joanna Hamilton / Rebecca Carmichael1-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesAshley Givens / Mary Bouchard vs Margaret Wray / Amret Hawfield6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLiz Harkey / Jill Rogers vs Emily Collins / Alisa O'grady2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDana Alligood / Anna Claire Ash vs Valerie Berger / Ashton Jackson6-0, 6-3
W#1 DoublesLauren Kazakos / Kelly Mcquellon vs Jenny Orr / Kathryn Simpson5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMeg Burr / Hollan Young vs Joanna Hamilton / Alisa O'grady3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMelanie Brost / Liz Harkey vs Dina Maguire / Katherine McPherson6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesHollan Young / Tammy LaValley vs Joanna Hamilton / Amret Hawfield1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDeana Georgitis / Kelly Mcquellon vs Dina Maguire / Debbie Hoover6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDana Alligood / Mary Bouchard vs Karen Lehman / Katherine McPherson6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 5.5 - Wednesday Morning have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Melanie Brost
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Deana Georgitis
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.98
Dana Alligood
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.96
Ashley Givens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Kelly Mcquellon
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.79
Mary Bouchard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.78
Lauren Kazakos
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.62
Tammy LaValley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Liz Harkey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.31
Hollan Young
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Anna Claire Ash
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.10
Ellery Day
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Meg Burr
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deana Georgitis + Dana Alligood11171% games+17.8% vs expected
Deana Georgitis + Melanie Brost6656% games+7.4% vs expected
Melanie Brost + Dana Alligood213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melanie Brost
40W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.17
3
Deana Georgitis
44W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Dana Alligood
30W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Ashley Givens
10W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
Kelly Mcquellon
13W–10L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
2.82
Mary Bouchard
8W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
Lauren Kazakos
9W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.78
Tammy LaValley
20W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.62
Liz Harkey
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
2.54
2.5
Hollan Young
3W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.31
2.5
Anna Claire Ash
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Ellery Day
3W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Meg Burr
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.