Teams

HBSQ-Cho+Henninger

2024 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-04vs CAC/SL-In Denial-KingLost 12
L#1 DoublesTina Chun / Peter Chang vs Steven Nguyen / Amanda Ortiz1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMark Henninger / Kisoon Cho vs Brian Peters / Kim Morrison6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNorma Brengelmann / Willem Mager vs Mariano Ortiz Jr / Kristin Peters6-4, 7-5
2024-07-28vs HBSQ-The Terminetters-RomaWon 21
L#1 DoublesWilliam Cohon / Carrie Wies vs Brad Tenney / Tracy Jolly6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCraig Lundgren / Rebecca Ringer vs Susan Thornberg / Everett Seven3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWillem Mager / Norma Brengelmann vs Gordon Capretto / Kimberly Dirksen6-2, 6-4
2024-07-27vs Lower Woodland (OUTDOORS) ZuckerLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarrie Wies / William Cohon vs Susan Sacks / Steve Chavez2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNorma Brengelmann / Mark Henninger vs Catherine Wilson / Todd Dunnington1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRebecca Ringer / Brian Nelson vs Blair Stone / Jeremy Zucker6-3, 7-6
2024-07-21vs EDG-Double Edges-YoungLost 12
W#1 DoublesWilliam Cohon / Carrie Wies vs Thomas Hei / Angela Hei6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPeter Chang / Cheryl Isen vs Teresa MacH / Thomas Hansen2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBrian Nelson / Rebecca Ringer vs Brook Koski / Bing Li4-6, 5-7
2024-07-13vs RTC-Love All-WhitneyWon 30
W#1 DoublesMark Henninger / Kisoon Cho vs Ananth Narayan / Julie Hansberry6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSuk Lee / Tina Chun vs Kenn Wildes / Elena Ivanova6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCraig Lundgren / Mee Lee vs Ziran Lin / Indu Tursa6-2, 6-2
2024-07-05vs NWW-TCSP-BlumLost 12
L#1 DoublesSuk Lee / Tina Chun vs Monica Blum / Eric Lindburg2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCheryl Isen / Jerry Isen vs Sally Revere / Lynwood Montgomery7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCraig Lundgren / Mee Lee vs Eric Zimbelman / Amy Zimbelman6-3, 6-2
2024-06-15vs FC-The Immortals-CalpeLost 12
L#1 DoublesSuk Lee / Joanna Nielsen vs Matthew Metz / Khue Tran6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrian Nelson / Mee Lee vs Zachary Fu / Lisa Brouelette4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMark Henninger / Carrie Wies vs Ramon Calpe / Francisca Lehr6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Joanna Nielsen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Cheryl Isen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Tina Chun
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
William Cohon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.34
Kisoon Cho
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.33
Rebecca Ringer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Jerry Isen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Mark Henninger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Brian Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.16
Mee Lee
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Norma Brengelmann
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Craig Lundgren
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Carrie Wies
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.05
Willem Mager
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Suk Lee
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Peter Chang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Isen + Jerry Isen8457% games+1.7% vs expected
Tina Chun + Suk Lee4650% games+0.8% vs expected
Jerry Isen + Joanna Nielsen6164% gamesnot enough data
Carrie Wies + William Cohon134 matchesnot enough data
Mee Lee + Suk Lee033 matchesnot enough data
Willem Mager + Norma Brengelmann303 matchesnot enough data
Brian Nelson + Joanna Nielsen303 matchesnot enough data
William Cohon + Rebecca Ringer303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Joanna Nielsen
47W–40L career · 1 line in 2024
1%89%9%
3.81
4
Cheryl Isen
83W–69L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Tina Chun
15W–22L career · type S · 3 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
4
William Cohon
62W–64L career · 3 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Kisoon Cho
59W–28L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Rebecca Ringer
63W–53L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Jerry Isen
59W–47L career · 1 line in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Mark Henninger
38W–46L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
3
Brian Nelson
50W–38L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
<1%8%92%
3.19
3.5
Mee Lee
46W–48L career · 3 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Norma Brengelmann
48W–44L career · 3 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Craig Lundgren
7W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
3
Carrie Wies
38W–39L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.09
3
Willem Mager
60W–45L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
3.05
3
Suk Lee
29W–28L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
2.82
Peter Chang
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.