Teams

The Place - Kirsten

2024 LEECHARLOTTE Adult 18 & Over Spring · 3.5 W Tuesday DAY

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-05-21vs Spring Winners Paseo - ZimmerLost 01
L#3 DoublesSusan Luebchow / Gina Mishler vs Wendy Olek / Teresa Ganley2-6, 3-6
2024-05-07vs Hancock - RiccioWon 10
W#3 DoublesDiane Blais / Susan Luebchow vs Susan Duncan / Elise Benkard6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-04-23vs UTC - CimringWon 10
W#3 DoublesDiane Blais / Susan Luebchow vs Amy Lewis / Lynn Longmire4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-04-16vs Hancock - RiccioWon 10
W#2 DoublesVickie Kirsten / Susan Luebchow vs Mary Alice Spencer / Susan Duncan6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Tuesday DAY have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Vickie Kirsten
published
3.40
Ula Griparis
published
3.36
Beth Sandman
published 3.5
3.33
Gina Mishler
published
3.27
Carla Sancin
published 3.5
Susan Luebchow
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Beth Schomp
published 3.5
2.95
Diane Blais
published 3.5
Jean McKinney
published
Kimberly Johnson
published
Lea Comet
published
Meghan Browne
published
Teresa Regelmann
published
Yvette Rudich
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gina Mishler + Ula Griparis11656% games+2.5% vs expected
Yvette Rudich + Lea Comet3253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vickie Kirsten
34W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.41
Ula Griparis
17W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Beth Sandman
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.36
Gina Mishler
16W–18L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Carla Sancin
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Susan Luebchow
9W–17L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Beth Schomp
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Diane Blais
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
2.95
Jean McKinney
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kimberly Johnson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lea Comet
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Meghan Browne
10W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Teresa Regelmann
17W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Yvette Rudich
11W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.