Teams

NITA S 65CMXc Oak Brook-Savanelli

2024 NITA3 Summerz Combo Mixed 18&O · NITA Summer Combo Mixed 6.5 18&O

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-22vs NITA S 65CMXb Five Star-BerryWon 10
W#1 DoublesLori Linehan / Mike Linehan vs Adam la France / Amy Karp7-6, 1-4, 1-0
2024-07-18vs NITA S 65CMXb Five Star-BerryLost 01
L#2 DoublesKatrina Kern / Nicholas Gunther vs CLAY BENTON / Colleen Mumford1-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesLori Linehan / Mike Linehan vs Austin Weisenbeck / Valerie Cook4-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesLori Linehan / Mike Linehan vs Scott Lutter / Cadden Kapsalis6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAvon Lok / Jason Leung vs Toni Mountcastle / Chris Gair5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKatrina Kern / Nicholas Gunther vs Dwight Janzen / Jeanine Janzen6-3, 6-1
2024-06-10vs NITA S 65CMXb Five Star-BerryWon 10
W#2 DoublesMike Linehan / Lori Linehan vs Jeffrey Pawlicki / Kimberly Searcy6-2, 6-0
2024-05-23vs NITA S 65CMXb Five Star-BerryLost 02
L#1 DoublesLori Linehan / Mike Linehan vs Mathew Philip / Larisa Adamian7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAvon Lok / Jason Leung vs Kyle Berry / Amy Karp4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · NITA Summer Combo Mixed 6.5 18&O
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA S 65CMXa Courts Plus-Mountcastle/Strickler6216819163
2NITA S 65CMXb Five Star-Berry44141022169
3NITA S 65CMXc Oak Brook-Savanelli2661837246

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Lori Linehan
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Avon Lok
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Julie Savanelli
published
Katrina Kern
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Mike Linehan
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Nicholas Gunther
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Linehan + Mike Linehan4648% gamesnot enough data
Katrina Kern + Nicholas Gunther314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lori Linehan
62W–28L career · 5 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3
Avon Lok
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Julie Savanelli
73W–50L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Katrina Kern
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mike Linehan
6W–7L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nicholas Gunther
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.