Teams

CMTA @ Liberty Park-Utgaard

2021 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 4.5W AM

15 players · average NTRP 4.10 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-08-09vs Utah CoalitionLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristi Roggensack / Lois Peterson vs Nichole Young / Michelle Moscon4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2021-08-02Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLois Peterson / Kristi Roggensack vs Marie Roberts / Cristie Briggs3-6, 3-6
2021-07-26vs Golds Gym-Mayberry/BlackhurstLost 01
L#2 DoublesLois Peterson / Christine Littleford vs Kristen Siddoway / Lisa Mayberry3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-07-19vs Ivory Ridge-HydeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristina Mooney / Renee Utgaard vs Debbie Moody / Katy Myers2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLois Peterson / Christine Littleford vs Melissa Auxier / Sue Curtis4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-07-12Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKimberly Simpson / Misty Morrow vs Laura Bailey / Julie Winterton3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRenee Utgaard / Merri Gillespie vs Jen Dickey / Kimberly Clawson1-6, 1-6
2021-06-28vs Salt Lake Tennis-KempLost 02
L#1 DoublesRenee Utgaard / Kristi Roggensack vs Emily Wallace / Nanette Heath0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMerri Gillespie / Misty Morrow vs Kim Levine / Cheri Greenburg3-6, 4-6
2021-06-21Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMisty Morrow / Teri Bishop vs Brook Vietor / Wendy Widerburg3-6, 2-6
2021-06-14vs Golds Gym-Mayberry/BlackhurstSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJill Jensen Clark / LIZ CARLSON vs Christy Davidson / Cathy Davis6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRenee Utgaard / Kristi Roggensack vs Katy Alder / Kristen Siddoway6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Kimberly Simpson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Christina Mooney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.02
Heather Foy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.92
Vicky Arne
usually #3 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.90
Catherine Bliss
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.88
Kristi Roggensack
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.71
Christine Littleford
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.69
Dorene Sambado
usually #1 Singles 92%, also #3 Doubles 8% · published 4
3.69
Lois Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.67
Teri Bishop
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published 4
3.66
Misty Morrow
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Renee Utgaard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Jill Jensen Clark
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
LIZ CARLSON
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Merri Gillespie
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Bliss + Kimberly Simpson12557% games+2.3% vs expected
Misty Morrow + Teri Bishop371854% games−0.8% vs expected
Kristi Roggensack + Kimberly Simpson7457% games−1.5% vs expected
Heather Foy + Christina Mooney6257% games−1.7% vs expected
Christina Mooney + LIZ CARLSON353351% games−1.9% vs expected
Kristi Roggensack + Renee Utgaard131150% games−2.6% vs expected
Catherine Bliss + Renee Utgaard3445% games−3.0% vs expected
Merri Gillespie + Teri Bishop81143% games−3.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Simpson
144W–57L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%70%30%
4.43
4.5
Christina Mooney
60W–46L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Heather Foy
59W–82L career · 2 lines in 2021
44%55%<1%
4.02
4
Vicky Arne
254W–151L career · 10 lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Catherine Bliss
239W–169L career · 9 lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Kristi Roggensack
126W–91L career · 14 lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Christine Littleford
116W–72L career · 8 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Dorene Sambado
102W–113L career · 12 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
Lois Peterson
49W–45L career · 4 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Teri Bishop
181W–151L career · 11 lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
3.67
4
Misty Morrow
79W–60L career · 3 lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
3.66
4
Renee Utgaard
156W–111L career · 4 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.65
Jill Jensen Clark
22W–15L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
LIZ CARLSON
45W–50L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
Merri Gillespie
47W–77L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.