Teams

CDTA S A55W7.0 8Glenbrook Edidin Mon 7 $25

CDTA 1Summer Adult 55 & Over · CDTA 55 & over W 7.0 Summer

22 players · average NTRP 3.33 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesCate Brodner / Lidia Dyjewski vs Jaye Schreier / Michele Motta6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSarah W Johnson / Donna Salvatore vs Sanda Petrut / Marcia Proffitt-Florence6-3, 6-3
L#1 DoublesCate Brodner / Jennifer Cicciu vs Apple Naughton / Sue Christianson0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJulia Happel / Barbara Eastman vs Rosa Hugener / Lisa Polisner4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesValerie Anderson / Barbara Chmieleski vs Noreen Ohcana / Laura Munitz Johnson6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 DoublesBarbara Chmieleski / Sheila Weinberg vs Margo Carvell / Sally Ann Martin5-7, 1-4
L#2 DoublesJulia Happel / Susan Walsh vs Mika Nomura / Cecilia Lauterbach4-6, 4-5
L#3 DoublesDonna Salvatore / Judy Stevens vs Lynn Callahan / Ryoko Howell3-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesCate Brodner / Valerie Anderson vs Diana Harris / Patricia Nick6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesRobin Meister / Judy Stevens vs Marie Dillon / Alja Hessami-Maas5-7, 3-5
L#3 DoublesKaren Hirsch / Sheila Weinberg vs Mandy Shaw / Christine Kupfer1-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesCate Brodner / Barbara Chmieleski vs Chris Nelson / Irene Okada4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLidia Dyjewski / Jennifer Cicciu vs Vilma Mitev / Nancy Nora7-6, 5-3
L#3 DoublesRosie Weaver / Barbara Eastman vs Maribeth Corbett / Teresa Cavaligos4-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesValerie Anderson / Cate Brodner vs Laura Knapp / Tracy Meyer6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Hirsch / Sarah W Johnson vs Rosemary Swierk / Masako Ueda0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDonna Salvatore / Maryanne Petritis vs Irene Salerno / Svetlana Kanev2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · CDTA 55 & over W 7.0 Summer
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S A55W7.0 3Tam Corey Wed 7 $226116513134
2CDTA S A55W7.0 5Naperville Bianchi Thu 7 $246115614137
3CDTA S A55W7.0 4Schaumburg Lauterbach Sun 1 $224312921190
4CDTA S A55W7.0 2Tam Grabow Tue 7 $224312922160
5CDTA S A55W7.0 6Lake Bluff Zusman Tue 7 $2043111026186
6CDTA S A55W7.0 8Glenbrook Edidin Mon 7 $252581329210
7CDTA S A55W7.0 7Centennial Okada Sun 1 $201671428196
8CDTA S A55W7.0 1MT Chi Brown Fri 7 $31.51631837231

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Karen Hirsch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Cate Brodner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Julia Happel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Lidia Dyjewski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Jennifer Cicciu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Barbara Chmieleski
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Anne Lewis
published 3
3.01
Sarah W Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Rosie Weaver
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Barbara Eastman
published 3
2.68
Michelle Michaels
published
Donna Salvatore
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Helen Kim
published
Judy Stevens
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Karen Edidin
published
Kathleen Sullivan
published
Maryanne Petritis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Robin Meister
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sheila Weinberg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Ellison
published
Valerie Anderson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah W Johnson + Barbara Chmieleski4343% games+5.0% vs expected
Cate Brodner + Sarah W Johnson211153% games+3.1% vs expected
Cate Brodner + Jennifer Cicciu3546% games+1.3% vs expected
Jennifer Cicciu + Anne Lewis2641% games−1.0% vs expected
Cate Brodner + Lidia Dyjewski4349% games−1.8% vs expected
Cate Brodner + Donna Salvatore51638% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Cicciu + Sheila Weinberg101054% gamesnot enough data
Rosie Weaver + Sheila Weinberg6549% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Hirsch
64W–73L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Cate Brodner
96W–153L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Julia Happel
34W–51L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Lidia Dyjewski
26W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
3.5
Jennifer Cicciu
34W–67L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Barbara Chmieleski
60W–158L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
3
Anne Lewis
60W–80L career · no lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
Sarah W Johnson
86W–127L career · 2 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
3.5
Rosie Weaver
31W–50L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
91%9%<1%
2.81
3
Barbara Eastman
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Michaels
36W–45L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Barbara Kramer Dibble
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Donna Salvatore
12W–100L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Helen Kim
0W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Judy Stevens
3W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Edidin
6W–25L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathleen Sullivan
23W–42L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Maryanne Petritis
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Robin Meister
12W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sheila Weinberg
22W–40L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Ellison
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Valerie Anderson
12W–21L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.