Teams

SD 2.5 LJTC/ Freedman

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WD · SD - Women - 2.5 (Monday)

6 players · average NTRP 2.67 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-09vs SoCal/Contreras/18&Over2.5FLost 03
L#1 DoublesLiz Baun / April Valentine vs Karina Contreras / Alejandra Teran2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesChan Salen vs Rachel Cline3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesOlga Freedman / Diana Randall vs Sarah Hatcher / Jane Lithopoulos4-6, 3-6
2025-06-02vs SD 2.5 Coronado TC/ JimenezSplit 11
W#1 SinglesApril Valentine vs Silvia Urbina6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLiz Baun / Olga Freedman vs Stephanie McAlister / Monica Olivares6-7, 6-7
2025-05-23vs SD 2.5 Peninsula TC/ SonbatyLost 12
W#1 DoublesApril Valentine / Julia Balkova vs Nicole Cooley / Ying Wang7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesDiana Randall vs Lauren Carter6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Smith / Olga Freedman vs Michelle Anilao / Vanessa Liguzinski3-6, 3-6
2025-05-16vs SD 2.5 Peninsula TC/ WilliamsWon 21
L#1 DoublesOlga Freedman / Diana Randall vs Mimi Rogers / Cheryl Hornbaker2-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesChan Salen vs Holly Swanson6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLiz Baun / Julia Balkova vs Linda Hastings / Kathee Weisenberg7-6, 6-2
2025-05-11vs SD 2.5 Mtn View/ VegaLost 03
L#1 DoublesDiana Randall / Julia Balkova vs Lucia Calleros / Catherine Block6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesApril Valentine vs Teresa Vega2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMegan Donovan / Olga Freedman vs Nuri Velasco Andrade / Ana Lucia Almada3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 DoublesDiana Randall / Diane Smith vs Jennifer Contreras / Katrina Contreras0-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesChan Salen vs Desiree Huynh6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMegan Donovan / April Valentine vs Samaria Cruz / Mingyu Wang6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 2.5 (Monday) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.27 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.68
Chan Salen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.45
Julia Balkova
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
April Valentine
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 2.5
2.06
Diana Randall
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 2.5
1.87
Olga Freedman
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Liz Baun
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Olga Freedman + Diana Randall033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Chan Salen
9W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
2.68
Julia Balkova
15W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.45
2.5
April Valentine
7W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Diana Randall
8W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Olga Freedman
5W–48L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.87
Liz Baun
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.