Teams

RVora-UNC

2026 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 Over Adult 3.5 Men Wknd

13 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-02vs JPobst-DURWon 31
W#1 DoublesRuchir Vora / Ted Bohlin vs Varun Patel / Stephen Mills6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesDerek Fulton vs Kevin Lloyd4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDerek Saccoccio / Peter Bream vs Matthew Ruterbories / Henrique Perez2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesCary Levine / Evan Zeitler vs Jordin Peiffer / Pete Gryson6-0, 6-0
2026-04-25vs CMoffitt_DURWon 32
W#1 DoublesJames White / Ted Bohlin vs Austin Gardner / Duncan Work7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesDerek Fulton vs Dash Rajarajhan3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPeter Bream / Derek Saccoccio vs Chris Moffitt / Kobi Talma6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesCary Levine vs Ray Rader6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPeter Z Tawil / David Pierce vs Richard Millard / Devon DiPalma6-3, 7-5
2026-04-18vs JByrd-DURLost 02
L#1 DoublesDerek Saccoccio / James White vs Aaron Kirschenfeld / Jameson Blount0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStuart Beeson / Ruchir Vora vs Chris Wasko / Casey Collins6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-04-11vs JByrd2-DURWon 20
W#1 DoublesTed Bohlin / Ruchir Vora vs Hong Yu / Philip Rosenberg6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDanyu Lin / Peter Bream vs Gerald Farren / Barry Gitarts7-5, 6-1
2026-03-28vs NPuri18-DURLost 13
L#1 DoublesTed Bohlin / Derek Saccoccio vs Rajeev Tonde / Sushrut Bhowmik6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesEric Shen vs Ranjith Dasaradhi6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesStuart Beeson / Josh Gouker vs Vishal Gupta / Rajshekar Chandraprakash2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDavid Pierce / Cary Levine vs Nishant Puri / Sumit Parimoo2-6, 1-6
2026-03-26vs JPobst-DURWon 41
W#1 DoublesJames White / Stuart Beeson vs Abram Graham / Jeff Pobst6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesEric Shen vs Joseph Davis6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRuchir Vora / Peter Z Tawil vs Kevin Lloyd / Victor Labarthe6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesCary Levine vs Elias Peters3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesEvan Zeitler / Danyu Lin vs Varun Patel / Jordin Peiffer6-2, 0-6, 1-0
2026-03-21vs SPanthri-DURLost 23
W#1 DoublesJames White / Tim Mounce vs Anish Arya / Kaushik Vemulapalli6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesEric Shen vs Rajiv Nair1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTed Bohlin / Ruchir Vora vs Rajeev Bhogadi / Kevin Kokal7-5, 6-4
L#2 SinglesDerek Fulton vs Ravi Verma5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesEvan Zeitler / Stuart Beeson vs Shivam Panthri / Ashutosh Chaudhari3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-03-19vs MFossum-HRWon 32
L#1 DoublesDerek Saccoccio / David Pierce vs Jefferson Balin / Mark Fossum4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesDerek Fulton vs Thomas Johnston6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPeter Z Tawil / Danyu Lin vs Michael Andre / Andrew Nelsen7-5, 6-3
L#2 SinglesEvan Zeitler vs Rory Dowling2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRuchir Vora / Josh Gouker vs Christopher Buccafusco / Caleb Kent6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 Over Adult 3.5 Men Wknd have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Peter Bream
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Ted Bohlin
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.42
Peter Z Tawil
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Derek Saccoccio
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.37
Ruchir Vora
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published 3.5
3.37
Eric Shen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.34
Tim Mounce
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Derek Fulton
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Evan Zeitler
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.24
Cary Levine
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Stuart Beeson
usually #1 Singles 30%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
3.13
Josh Gouker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.91
Danyu Lin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ruchir Vora + Ted Bohlin4160% games+8.0% vs expected
Derek Saccoccio + Peter Bream13364% games−1.6% vs expected
Peter Bream + Ruchir Vora5159% gamesnot enough data
Derek Saccoccio + Ruchir Vora123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Peter Bream
98W–43L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.53
Ted Bohlin
8W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
Peter Z Tawil
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Derek Saccoccio
132W–95L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
3.40
3.5
Ruchir Vora
72W–55L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.37
Eric Shen
11W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
Tim Mounce
11W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Derek Fulton
2W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Evan Zeitler
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Cary Levine
2W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Stuart Beeson
22W–8L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.23
Josh Gouker
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.13
3
Danyu Lin
3W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.