Teams

Ambrose/Knoxville

2025 Mixed 40 & Over-Knoxville · 3.5 Mixed 40&over

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-29vs Arnold/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrooke Govert / Matt Cupp vs Debi English / Curtis DeFord2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEmily Elison / Trips Dawson vs Kevin Keck / Emily Smead6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLaura Spurgin / Lance Taylor vs Eric Arnsdorff / Jennifer Collins6-7, 4-6
2025-07-20vs Hoschette (OPEN) /KnoxvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesTrips Dawson / Paola Martinez vs Son Duong / Yoko Umezawa6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTanya Davidson / Michael Douglas vs Marty Hoschette / Stacey Wright6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrooke Govert / Tyler Govert vs Thomas Flores / Michelle Wakefield6-3, 6-2
2025-07-06vs Arnold/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesTrips Dawson / Laura Spurgin vs Eric Arnsdorff / Debi English7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLance Taylor / Tanya Davidson vs Shawn Huffman / Wendi Arnold6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMatt Cupp / Jessica Taylor vs Kevin Keck / Emily Smead1-6, 3-6
2025-06-29vs Hoschette (OPEN) /KnoxvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesTrips Dawson / Emily Elison vs Yoko Umezawa / Son Duong6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLance Taylor / Paola Martinez vs Thomas Flores / Jill Hoschette7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesTyler Govert / Jessica Taylor vs Christopher Behan / Kelly Hollingsworth6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Mixed 40&over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Trey Ambrose
published
3.56
Emily Elison
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.49
Matt Cupp
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.44
Lance Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Paola Martinez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Laura Spurgin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
Michael Douglas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Tyler Govert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Brooke Govert
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Tanya Davidson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Trips Dawson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Trey Ambrose
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.97
4
Emily Elison
136W–77L career · 2 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
Matt Cupp
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
Lance Taylor
16W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.44
Paola Martinez
56W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Laura Spurgin
41W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Michael Douglas
17W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Tyler Govert
18W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3
Brooke Govert
26W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
Tanya Davidson
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
Trips Dawson
3W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.