Teams

Fred Wells Gordon 10:30am

2023 Women's Daytime Doubles · 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Stephanie Crowl
published
3.48
Bridget Batzler
published 4
3.46
Tiffany Anderson
published
3.41
Susan Volin
published
3.37
Michele Mingo
published
3.26
Laura Abraham
published
3.25
Megan Tucci
published
3.19
Joan Cahill
published
3.18
Debra Tresidder
published 3.5
3.13
Kathleen Gesensway
published
3.11
Jill Riley
published
2.99
Jill Therien
published
2.76
Cindy Harriage
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Crowl + Tiffany Anderson3642% games+1.4% vs expected
Bridget Batzler + Tiffany Anderson9750% games−4.1% vs expected
Kathleen Gesensway + Jill Riley3344% games−12.3% vs expected
Michele Mingo + Tiffany Anderson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Crowl
34W–47L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.70
4
Bridget Batzler
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.48
Tiffany Anderson
32W–34L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
Susan Volin
26W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%24%
3.41
Michele Mingo
15W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
Laura Abraham
16W–19L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.26
Megan Tucci
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.25
Joan Cahill
22W–21L career · no lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Debra Tresidder
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
Kathleen Gesensway
12W–13L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.13
Jill Riley
18W–15L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
Jill Therien
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
Cindy Harriage
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
2.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.