Teams

Milam 18s 8.5 Combo W Tues PM

2025 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 18 & Over Women

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesKatie Shane / Jessica Bair-Epps vs Yukari Matsuoka / Sayaka Matsuoka6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSamantha Harlow / Suzanne Rudy vs Brittany Furr / Rhyssa Earley0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKristin Williamson / Madison Bowen vs Rolinde Cleyman / Bonnie Satterfield6-3, 6-2
2025-09-30vs Cartee 18s 8.5 Combo W Tues PMLost 01
L#2 DoublesLynne Murray / Katie Shane vs Kara Ray / Jane Clarke5-7, 4-6
2025-09-23vs Goy 18s 8.5 Combo W Tues PMWon 21
L#1 DoublesKatie Shane / Caroline McAlister vs Jill Perez / Cheryl Bock5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Rudy / Ann Evans vs Kathy Pace / Chetana Honnarayanahalli6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKristin Williamson / Madison Bowen vs Jennifer Tewksbury / Kathryn Fleihan6-1, 6-3
2025-09-16vs Smith 18s 8.5 Combo W Tues PMLost 01
L#3 DoublesSamantha Harlow / Lynne Murray vs Christina Rush / Heather Parr6-7, 3-6
W#1 DoublesKatie Shane / Kelly Lombardino vs Rhyssa Earley / Brittany Furr6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJessica Bair-Epps / Martha Benbow vs Yukari Matsuoka / Sayaka Matsuoka6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSamantha Harlow / Sally Eagleton vs Joy Martin / Melissa Goodman6-2, 6-1
2025-08-26vs Cartee 18s 8.5 Combo W Tues PMWon 10
W#2 DoublesSamantha Harlow / Lynne Murray vs Mimi Cartee / Jane Clarke7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2025-08-19vs Goy 18s 8.5 Combo W Tues PMWon 30
W#1 DoublesClaire Parsons / Sally Eagleton vs Crystal Mercado / Joyce Perez6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Rudy / Ann Evans vs Judiann Georgevich / Kathy Pace6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKristin Williamson / Madison Bowen vs Jill Perez / Kimberly Franz2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-08-12vs Smith 18s 8.5 Combo W Tues PMLost 01
L#2 DoublesJessica Bair-Epps / Lynne Murray vs Brenda Willis / Jane Owens1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Samantha Harlow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.02
Jessica Bair-Epps
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.00
Kelly Lombardino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.95
Sally Eagleton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.89
Kristin Williamson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Madison Bowen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Katie Shane
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Lauren Ivey
published
3.70
Ann Evans
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Lynne Murray
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.67
Claire Parsons
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Caroline McAlister
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.39
Nancye Milam
published
3.37
Suzanne Rudy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Martha Benbow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rosemary Dedman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Williamson + Madison Bowen16365% games+11.6% vs expected
Kelly Lombardino + Katie Shane1443% games−2.5% vs expected
Lynne Murray + Jessica Bair-Epps4159% gamesnot enough data
Suzanne Rudy + Ann Evans303 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Lombardino + Jessica Bair-Epps213 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Lombardino + Kristin Williamson033 matchesnot enough data
Lynne Murray + Caroline McAlister213 matchesnot enough data
Katie Shane + Caroline McAlister123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Samantha Harlow
11W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
4.08
Jessica Bair-Epps
18W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
4.02
Kelly Lombardino
6W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
51%49%<1%
4.00
Sally Eagleton
20W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.95
Kristin Williamson
42W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.89
Madison Bowen
30W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
Katie Shane
24W–22L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Lauren Ivey
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Ann Evans
24W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Lynne Murray
164W–88L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Claire Parsons
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Caroline McAlister
4W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.67
Nancye Milam
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
3.39
Suzanne Rudy
7W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
3.37
Martha Benbow
6W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rosemary Dedman
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.